These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27647812)

  • 1. Bayesian correction for covariate measurement error: A frequentist evaluation and comparison with regression calibration.
    Bartlett JW; Keogh RH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1695-1708. PubMed ID: 27647812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies.
    van Smeden M; Penning de Vries BBL; Nab L; Groenwold RHH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():89-100. PubMed ID: 33176189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2278-94. PubMed ID: 21590792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An imputation-based solution to using mismeasured covariates in propensity score analysis.
    Webb-Vargas Y; Rudolph KE; Lenis D; Murakami P; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1824-1837. PubMed ID: 26037527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models: a Bayesian approach.
    Gryparis A; Coull BA; Schwartz J
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():S20-8. PubMed ID: 18079761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian measurement error approach to QT interval correction and prolongation.
    Chen J; Zhao X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):523-42. PubMed ID: 20358434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dealing with missing covariates in epidemiologic studies: a comparison between multiple imputation and a full Bayesian approach.
    Erler NS; Rizopoulos D; Rosmalen Jv; Jaddoe VW; Franco OH; Lesaffre EM
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2955-74. PubMed ID: 27042954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian semi-parametric scalar-on-function regression with measurement error using instrumental variables.
    Zoh RS; Luan Y; Xue L; Allison DB; Tekwe CD
    Stat Med; 2024 Sep; 43(21):4043-4054. PubMed ID: 38978160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation in the presence of high-dimensional data.
    Zhao Y; Long Q
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2021-2035. PubMed ID: 24275026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A semiparametric imputation approach for regression with censored covariate with application to an AMD progression study.
    Ding Y; Kong S; Kang S; Chen W
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3293-3308. PubMed ID: 29845616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalisation of the method of regression calibration and comparison with Bayesian and frequentist model averaging methods.
    Little MP; Hamada N; Zablotska LB
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6613. PubMed ID: 38503853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Approach to Addressing Multiple Imputation Model Uncertainty Using Bayesian Model Averaging.
    Kaplan D; Yavuz S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):553-567. PubMed ID: 31538505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binary regression with misclassified response and covariate subject to measurement error: a bayesian approach.
    McGlothlin A; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
    Biom J; 2008 Feb; 50(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 18283683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian adjustment for multiplicative measurement errors for a calibration problem with application to a stem cell study.
    Zhang P; Liu J; Dong J; Holovati JL; Letcher B; McGann LE
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):268-74. PubMed ID: 21689082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian analysis of time-series data under case-crossover designs: posterior equivalence and inference.
    Li S; Mukherjee B; Batterman S; Ghosh M
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):925-36. PubMed ID: 24289144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 17329317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes.
    Li B; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():77. PubMed ID: 21605357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.