231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27649481)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: An intraindividual assessment of the effect of temporal resolution on qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of histopathologically proven prostate cancer.
Ream JM; Doshi AM; Dunst D; Parikh N; Kong MX; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1464-1475. PubMed ID: 27649481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Temporal Resolution on Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
Othman AE; Falkner F; Weiss J; Kruck S; Grimm R; Martirosian P; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2016 May; 51(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 26619282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters.
Othman AE; Falkner F; Martirosian P; Schraml C; Schwentner C; Nickel D; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2016 Feb; 51(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26447494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method.
Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging: the role of qualitative and quantitative parameters for evaluating prostate tumors stratified by Gleason score and PI-RADS v2.
Afshari Mirak S; Mohammadian Bajgiran A; Sung K; Asvadi NH; Markovic D; Felker ER; Lu D; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jul; 45(7):2225-2234. PubMed ID: 31549211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced characterization of the index lesion with multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer patients.
Yuan Q; Costa DN; Sénégas J; Xi Y; Wiethoff AJ; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn C; Lenkinski RE; Pedrosa I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):908-916. PubMed ID: 27442039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.
Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB; Otazo R; Sodickson DK; Kang SK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 30629317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of prostate cancer local recurrence following radical prostatectomy: assessment using a continuously acquired radial golden-angle compressed sensing acquisition.
Rosenkrantz AB; Khasgiwala A; Doshi AM; Ream JM; Taneja SS; Lepor H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jan; 42(1):290-297. PubMed ID: 27576605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced case-control analysis in 3T MRI of prostate cancer can help to characterize tumor aggressiveness.
Sanz-Requena R; Martí-Bonmatí L; Pérez-Martínez R; García-Martí G
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 27776667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can DCE-MRI reduce the number of PI-RADS v.2 false positive findings? Role of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters in prostate lesions characterization.
Cristel G; Esposito A; Damascelli A; Briganti A; Ambrosi A; Brembilla G; Brunetti L; Antunes S; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():51-57. PubMed ID: 31439258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer.
Krishna S; Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Shabana WM; Lim RS; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):176-185. PubMed ID: 28387981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience.
Rosenkrantz AB; Geppert C; Grimm R; Block TK; Glielmi C; Feng L; Otazo R; Ream JM; Romolo MM; Taneja SS; Sodickson DK; Chandarana H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1365-73. PubMed ID: 24833417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the need for DCE MRI in the detection of dominant lesions in the whole gland: Correlation between histology and MRI of prostate cancer.
Kozlowski P; Chang SD; Jones EC; Goldenberg SL
NMR Biomed; 2018 Mar; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 29266527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy: Limited added value for readers of varying level of experience.
Luzurier A; Jouve De Guibert PH; Allera A; Feldman SF; Conort P; Simon JM; Mozer P; Compérat E; Boudghene F; Servois V; Lucidarme O; Granger B; Renard-Penna R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 29517822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) v. 2 assessment categories 4 and 5 compared to histopathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Lim RS; Breau RH; Flood TA; Krishna S; Morash C; Shabana WM; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):257-266. PubMed ID: 27807914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.
Chen L; Liu D; Zhang J; Xie B; Zhou X; Grimm R; Huang X; Wang J; Feng L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 29437281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Luo X; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 23892233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
