These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27649483)
1. Selectivity of conventional electrodes for recording motor evoked potentials: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography. Gallina A; Peters S; Neva JL; Boyd LA; Garland SJ Muscle Nerve; 2017 Jun; 55(6):828-834. PubMed ID: 27649483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of motor evoked potentials elicited from multiple forearm muscles: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography. Neva JL; Gallina A; Peters S; Garland SJ; Boyd LA Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():91-99. PubMed ID: 28935187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanomyographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation from biceps brachii and during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on extensor carpi radialis. Reza MF; Ikoma K; Chuma T; Mano Y J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Dec; 149(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16026847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time-dependent changes in motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation combined with voluntary drive. Sugawara K; Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Saito K; Higashi T Neuroreport; 2014 Apr; 25(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 24356108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motor cortical plasticity in extrinsic hand muscles is determined by the resting thresholds of overlapping representations. Mirdamadi JL; Suzuki LY; Meehan SK Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():132-9. PubMed ID: 27425211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans. Hasegawa Y; Kasai T; Tsuji T; Yahagi S Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 11685391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decoding firings of a large population of human motor units from high-density surface electromyogram in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Škarabot J; Ammann C; Balshaw TG; Divjak M; Urh F; Murks N; Foffani G; Holobar A J Physiol; 2023 May; 601(10):1719-1744. PubMed ID: 36946417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reciprocal changes in input-output curves of motor evoked potentials while learning motor skills. Suzuki M; Kirimoto H; Onishi H; Yamada S; Tamaki H; Maruyama A; Yamamoto J Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 1473():114-23. PubMed ID: 22871269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Muscle imaging: mapping responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation with high-density surface electromyography. van Elswijk G; Kleine BU; Overeem S; Eshuis B; Hekkert KD; Stegeman DF Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 18387593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time changes in corticospinal excitability related to motor imagery of a force control task. Tatemoto T; Tsuchiya J; Numata A; Osawa R; Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Otaka Y; Sugawara K Behav Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 335():185-190. PubMed ID: 28827129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absence of facilitation or depression of motor evoked potentials after contralateral homologous muscle activation. Samii A; Caños M; Ikoma K; Wassermann EM; Hallett M Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 105(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9216493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task dependent gain regulation of spinal circuits projecting to the human flexor carpi radialis. Carroll TJ; Baldwin ER; Collins DF Exp Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 161(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 15551085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EMG discharge patterns during human grip movement are task-dependent and not modulated by muscle contraction modes: a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study. Anson JG; Hasegawa Y; Kasai T; Latash ML; Yahagi S Brain Res; 2002 May; 934(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 11955480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can forearm muscle activity be selectively recorded using conventional surface EMG-electrodes in transcranial magnetic stimulation? A feasibility study. Bakker CD; van Kuijk AA; Geurts AC; Stegeman DF; Pasman JW J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Jun; 24(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24690165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corticomotor excitability changes seen in the resting forearm during contralateral rhythmical movement and force manipulations: a TMS study. Ibey RJ; Staines WR Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():265-74. PubMed ID: 24070855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury. Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of antagonistic voluntary contraction on motor responses in the forearm. Izumi S; Koyama Y; Furukawa T; Ishida A Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jun; 111(6):1008-14. PubMed ID: 10825707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different motor learning effects on excitability changes of motor cortex in muscle contraction state. Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Higashi T Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 23560694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence That Brain-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Could Elicit Targeted Corticospinal Facilitation of Hand Muscles in Healthy Young Adults. Suzuki Y; Jovanovic LI; Fadli RA; Yamanouchi Y; Marquez-Chin C; Popovic MR; Nomura T; Milosevic M Neuromodulation; 2023 Dec; 26(8):1612-1621. PubMed ID: 35088740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age and gender effects on submental motor-evoked potentials. Sella O; Jones RD; Huckabee ML Age (Dordr); 2014; 36(6):9735. PubMed ID: 25502005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]