377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27649521)
41. Diffusion-weighted MRI: usefulness for differentiating intrapancreatic accessory spleen and small hypervascular neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas.
Kang BK; Kim JH; Byun JH; Lee SS; Kim HJ; Kim SY; Lee MG
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1157-65. PubMed ID: 24259300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kul S; Metin Y; Kul M; Metin N; Eyuboglu I; Ozdemir O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1668-1677. PubMed ID: 29734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma.
Lin G; Yang LY; Huang YT; Ng KK; Ng SH; Ueng SH; Chao A; Yen TC; Chang TC; Lai CH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 26383110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Tang M; Min Z; Lu J; Lei X; Zhang X
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 26275624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Preliminary study of combining T2-weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostatic central gland cancer].
Li P; Yang W; Chen Z; Guo Y; Cai L; Du Y; Li Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 94(31):2448-51. PubMed ID: 25400054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Apparent diffusion coefficient values may help predict which MRI-detected high-risk breast lesions will upgrade at surgical excision.
Cheeney S; Rahbar H; Dontchos BN; Javid SH; Rendi MH; Partridge SC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 28181343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing diagnostic accuracy of luminal water imaging with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: A quantitative MRI study.
Sabouri S; Chang SD; Goldenberg SL; Savdie R; Jones EC; Black PC; Fazli L; Kozlowski P
NMR Biomed; 2019 Feb; 32(2):e4048. PubMed ID: 30575145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Study of diffusion weighted imaging in combination with conventional MRI signs for inflammation activity of chronic hepatitis B].
Ren HW; Ye HY; An WM; Dong JH; Liu Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(19):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 28535640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Multiparametric approach with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a comparison study for differentiating between benign and malignant bone lesions in adults.
Oh E; Yoon YC; Kim JH; Kim K
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jul; 72(7):552-559. PubMed ID: 28325514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Qualitative characterization of breast tumors with diffusion-weighted imaging has comparable accuracy to quantitative analysis.
Kul S; Metin Y; Bekircavusoglu S; Kul M
Clin Imaging; 2021 Sep; 77():17-24. PubMed ID: 33639496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma.
Lu S; Wang S; Gao Q; Zhou M; Li Y; Cao P; Hong X; Shi H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 28806317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy: Limited added value for readers of varying level of experience.
Luzurier A; Jouve De Guibert PH; Allera A; Feldman SF; Conort P; Simon JM; Mozer P; Compérat E; Boudghene F; Servois V; Lucidarme O; Granger B; Renard-Penna R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 29517822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Multimodality fMRI with perfusion, diffusion-weighted MRI and
Zhu L; Wang J; Shi H; Tao X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):423-432. PubMed ID: 30475438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Improved performance in differentiating benign from malignant sinonasal tumors using diffusion-weighted combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang XY; Yan F; Hao H; Wu JX; Chen QH; Xian JF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Mar; 128(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 25698188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.
Tan SL; Rahmat K; Rozalli FI; Mohd-Shah MN; Aziz YF; Yip CH; Vijayananthan A; Ng KH
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24156797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Differentiation between sinonasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas by RESOLVE DWI combined with conventional MRI.
He M; Tang Z; Qiang J; Xiao Z; Zhang Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():10-17. PubMed ID: 31212002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.
Kul S; Cansu A; Alhan E; Dinc H; Gunes G; Reis A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 21178069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Yang X; Dong M; Li S; Chai R; Zhang Z; Li N; Zhang L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4795-4805. PubMed ID: 32350660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The value of breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging in small hepatocellular carcinoma lesion (Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y; Chen CZ; Shen JZ; Li RC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(9):592-6. PubMed ID: 19595157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer.
Yoshida S; Masuda H; Ishii C; Tanaka H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 21178054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
