135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27650077)
1. Balancing the benefits and risks of choice.
The Lancet
Lancet; 2016 Sep; 388(10050):1129. PubMed ID: 27650077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening.
Stefanek ME
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Dec; 103(24):1821-6. PubMed ID: 22106094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The screening muddle.
Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):459. PubMed ID: 9482430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reining in patient and individual choice.
Sheehan M
J Med Ethics; 2014 May; 40(5):291-2. PubMed ID: 24736811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lung cancer screening gets risk-specific.
Peres J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Jan; 105(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23257155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer screening at National Cancer Institute comprehensive and clinical cancer centers.
Taylor KL; Africano NL; Schwartz M; Cullen J; Ahaghotu C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Mar; 96(5):414-5. PubMed ID: 14996868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Early detection reminder systems a boon for cancer screenings.
Dolinger J
Del Med J; 1999 Sep; 71(9):385-6. PubMed ID: 10584439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"].
Kovács A; Budai A; Döbrössy L; Péntek Z; Ormándi K; Forrai G
Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2031-2, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21106484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing mammography's benefits and harms.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju103. PubMed ID: 24685934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risks of PSA screening now better understood.
Peres J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Nov; 105(21):1590-2. PubMed ID: 24142893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doctors, Patients, and Nudging in the Clinical Context--Four Views on Nudging and Informed Consent.
Ploug T; Holm S
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(10):28-38. PubMed ID: 26479099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening for cancer].
Bjørge T; Tropé CG; Engeland A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Mar; 119(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 10228417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism.
Ploug T; Holm S; Brodersen J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Dec; 66(12):1193-6. PubMed ID: 22766778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix.
Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1013-26. PubMed ID: 776379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical screening: the next five years.
Haddow P
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10444720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Task force issues new screening guidelines.
Eastman P
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Jan; 88(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 8537979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The inadequacy of incompetence.
Culver CM; Gert B
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(4):619-43. PubMed ID: 2292993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [How is prevention changing in Italy?].
Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):277. PubMed ID: 19353959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.
Smith RA; Mettlin CJ; Davis KJ; Eyre H
CA Cancer J Clin; 2000; 50(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 10735014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
