BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

4306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27650663)

  • 1. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of genetic toxicology information for risk assessment.
    Dearfield KL; Moore MM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005 Dec; 46(4):236-45. PubMed ID: 16258925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Need and potential value of the Pig-ain vivo mutation assay-a HESI perspective.
    Schuler M; Gollapudi BB; Thybaud V; Kim JH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Dec; 52(9):685-9. PubMed ID: 21976154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of a next generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the industrial chemical benzene.
    Luijten M; Ball NS; Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Johnson GE; Madia F; Peel L; Pfuhler S; Settivari RS; Ter Burg W; White PA; van Benthem J
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Jan; 61(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 31709603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opportunities to integrate new approaches in genetic toxicology: an ILSI-HESI workshop report.
    Zeiger E; Gollapudi B; Aardema MJ; Auerbach S; Boverhof D; Custer L; Dedon P; Honma M; Ishida S; Kasinski AL; Kim JH; Manjanatha MG; Marlowe J; Pfuhler S; Pogribny I; Slikker W; Stankowski LF; Tanir JY; Tice R; van Benthem J; White P; Witt KL; Thybaud V
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2015 Apr; 56(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 25482136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era.
    Chiu WA; Euling SY; Scott CS; Subramaniam RP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 271(3):309-23. PubMed ID: 20353796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up actions from positive results of in vitro genetic toxicity testing.
    Dearfield KL; Thybaud V; Cimino MC; Custer L; Czich A; Harvey JS; Hester S; Kim JH; Kirkland D; Levy DD; Lorge E; Moore MM; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Schuler M; Suter W; Sweder K; Tarlo K; van Benthem J; van Goethem F; Witt KL
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Apr; 52(3):177-204. PubMed ID: 20963811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New Toxicology Tools and the Emerging Paradigm Shift in Environmental Health Decision-Making.
    Ginsberg GL; Pullen Fedinick K; Solomon GM; Elliott KC; Vandenberg JJ; Barone S; Bucher JR
    Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Dec; 127(12):125002. PubMed ID: 31834829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In utero Exposure to Genotoxicants Leading to Genetic Mosaicism: An Overlooked Window of Susceptibility in Genetic Toxicology Testing?
    Godschalk RWL; Yauk CL; van Benthem J; Douglas GR; Marchetti F
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Jan; 61(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 31743493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of genetic toxicology data in U.S. EPA risk assessment: the mercury study report as an example.
    Schoeny R
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 May; 104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):663-73. PubMed ID: 8781402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.
    Dellarco M; Zaleski R; Gaborek BJ; Qian H; Bellin CA; Egeghy P; Heard N; Jolliet O; Lander DR; Sunger N; Stylianou KS; Tanir JY
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 47(4):317-341. PubMed ID: 28266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevance and follow-up of positive results in in vitro genetic toxicity assays: an ILSI-HESI initiative.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Casciano D; Dellarco V; Embry MR; Gollapudi BB; Hayashi M; Holsapple MP; Jacobson-Kram D; Kasper P; MacGregor JT; Rees R
    Mutat Res; 2007 Oct; 633(2):67-79. PubMed ID: 17616430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of dose-response data in a margin of exposure approach to carcinogenic risk assessment for genotoxic chemicals in food.
    Benford DJ
    Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 26297741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 216.