318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27650933)
1. Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.
Shangguan X; Dong B; Wang Y; Xu F; Shao X; Sha J; Zhu Y; Pan J; Xue W
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 27650933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical outcomes between upgraded pathologic Gleason score 3 + 4 and non-upgraded 3 + 4 prostate cancer among patients who are candidates for active surveillance.
Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Oh JJ
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1729-34. PubMed ID: 25809876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.
DeLancey JO; Wood DP; He C; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Miller DC; Jacobs BL; Montie JE; Hollenbeck BK; Skolarus TA
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 23374801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Trock B; Kane CJ
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1633-8. PubMed ID: 15073850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases.
Kates M; Sopko NA; Han M; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26264998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes.
Mikel Hubanks J; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Houston Thompson R; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Jeffrey Karnes R
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):26.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
