BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27651725)

  • 1. Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.
    Öz M; Çetinkaya N; Korkmaz E; Seçkin KD; Meydanlı MM; Güngör T
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2016; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 27651725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer?
    Tasci T; Turan T; Ureyen I; Karalok A; Kalyoncu R; Boran N; Tulunay G
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25259663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
    Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
    Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
    BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
    Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors predicting residual lesion in subsequent hysterectomy following cold knife conization (CKC) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).
    Zeng Y; Jiang T; Zheng Y; Yang J; Wei H; Yi C; Liu Y; Chen K
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):358. PubMed ID: 36042513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
    He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
    Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy.
    Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
    Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
    Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
    Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
    Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive margins after cervical conization as an indicator of residual dysplasia.
    Huang M; Anderson P
    Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 10838299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risk of residual neoplasia in women with microinvasive squamous cervical carcinoma and positive cone margins.
    Phongnarisorn C; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Siriaungkul S; Suprasert P; Charoenkwan K; Cheewakriangkrai C; Siriaree S; Pantasri T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16681742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
    Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Kasunan A; Sribanditmongkol N; Siriaungkul S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 119(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 22939281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up.
    Ioffe OB; Brooks SE; De Rezende RB; Silverberg SG
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 10202667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-LEEP Cone Procedure as an Alternative to Cold-Knife Conization in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
    Husseinzadeh N; Retting WL
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 25950891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.
    Sun Y; He Y; Zhuoma M; Hua Z; Sun Z; Jiang N; Kong F; Xiao Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):260. PubMed ID: 37612769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Risk factors of predicting residual disease in women with stage I a1 squamous cervical carcinoma after conization].
    Zhu XE; Feng Y; Fu YF; Cheng XD; Chen XD; Xie X; Lü WG
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 93(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 23660325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.