BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27651725)

  • 21. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
    Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
    Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jiang Y; Chen C; Li L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170587. PubMed ID: 28125627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
    Phelps JY; Ward JA; Szigeti J; Bowland CH; Mayer AR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 8008307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Practical Model for Residual/Recurrent Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions in Patients with Negative Margins after Cold-Knife Conization.
    Chen W; Dong Y; Liu L; Jia L; Meng L; Liu H; Wang L; Xu Y; Zhang Y; Qiao X
    J Clin Med; 2022 Sep; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36233503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
    Lea JS; Shin CH; Sheets EE; Coleman RL; Gehrig PA; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Oct; 87(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 12468353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Positive endocervical margins at conization: repeat conization or colposcopic follow-up? A retrospective study.
    Chambo Filho A; Garbeloto E; Guarconi JR; Partele MP
    J Clin Med Res; 2015 Jul; 7(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 26015819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
    Tseng CJ; Liang CC; Lin CT; Huang KG; Chou HH; Chang TC; Lai CH; Soong YK; Hsueh S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 10094886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the risk factors of residual lesions after conization and prognosis of multifocal micro-invasive squamous cell cervical carcinoma treated with different types of surgery.
    Luo C; Qiu J; Zhang J; Yuan L; Liu C; Wang C; Li Y; Zhang L; Cheng W
    Mol Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 11(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 31475064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
    Bretelle F; Cravello L; Yang L; Benmoura D; Roger V; Blanc B
    Ann Chir; 2000 Jun; 125(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 10925486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
    Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk factors predicting pathological degradation after cervical excision in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II P16-positive patients over 25 years old: a cross-sectional study.
    Chen L; Zhang Y; Liu L; Hayashi T; Cui N; Liu Y
    Transl Cancer Res; 2023 Nov; 12(11):3147-3155. PubMed ID: 38130298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Cervical Cold-Knife Conization (CKC) on HPV Infection in Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study.
    Gao S; Huang L; Wang T; Wang J
    Int J Womens Health; 2023; 15():1681-1691. PubMed ID: 37937222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?
    Munro A; Leung Y; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Semmens J; Codde J; Williams V; O'Leary P; Steel N; Cohen P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 25769659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frozen section evaluation of cervical cold knife cone specimens is accurate in the diagnosis of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma.
    Giuntoli RL; Winburn KA; Silverman MB; Keeney GL; Cliby WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 91(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 14599856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Further study of the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
    Kennedy AW; Biscotti CV
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 86(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 12217762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
    Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins.
    Itsukaichi M; Kurata H; Matsushita M; Watanabe M; Sekine M; Aoki Y; Tanaka K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 12893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.