483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27652678)
1. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthesis and Hybrid Strategy Consideration for Treating Two-level Cervical Disc Degeneration in Hybrid Surgery.
Li Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Tyagi R; Liu W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(6):379-387. PubMed ID: 28678112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc.
Li Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Aug; 12(8):1399-1409. PubMed ID: 28597366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant.
Li Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Tyagi R; Zhang G; Liu W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1173-E1181. PubMed ID: 28198781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y; Rong X; Ding C; Chen H
Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Finite Element Modeling Study of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis Versus Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Disc or Prodisc C.
Choi H; Purushothaman Y; Baisden JL; Rajasekaran D; Jebaseelan D; Yoganandan N
Mil Med; 2021 Jan; 186(Suppl 1):737-744. PubMed ID: 33499493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Wang BY; Rong X; Hong Y; Ding C; Chen H; Liu H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 30704444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.
Choi H; Purushothaman Y; Baisden J; Yoganandan N
Eur Spine J; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2631-2639. PubMed ID: 31606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics?
Mo Z; Zhao Y; Du C; Sun Y; Zhang M; Fan Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):E469-75. PubMed ID: 25868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-Ray-based Kinematic Analysis of Cervical Spine According to Prosthesis Designs: Analysis of the Mobi C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LP.
Park SB; Kim KJ; Jin YJ; Kim HJ; Jahng TA; Chung CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jun; 28(5):E291-7. PubMed ID: 23429318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
