BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27653264)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.
    Yashwant V A; K R; Arumugam E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 27653264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.
    Konstantonis D
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 21932939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.
    Cummins DM; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 7598103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esthetic impact of premolar extraction and nonextraction treatments on Korean borderline patients.
    Lim HJ; Ko KT; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18405816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
    Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Lin PT; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face.
    Ismail SF; Moss JP; Hennessy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Mar; 121(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 11941338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
    Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients.
    Xu TM; Liu Y; Yang MZ; Huang W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 16679208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Khan M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jul; 20(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 20642945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental, skeletal, and soft-tissue changes in adult orthodontic patients treated with premolar extraction and nonextraction: A cross-sectional study.
    Maaz M; Fida M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 35570094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 7847270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profile changes following orthodontic correction of bimaxillary protrusion with a preadjusted edgewise appliance.
    Tan TJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 9456627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.