These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27653266)

  • 21. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Periapical and endodontic status scale based on periapical bone lesions and endodontic treatment quality evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Venskutonis T; Plotino G; Tocci L; Gambarini G; Maminskas J; Juodzbalys G
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25498834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
    Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
    Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry.
    Shin HS; Nam KC; Park H; Choi HU; Kim HY; Park CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20130439. PubMed ID: 24845340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography.
    Takeshita WM; Chicarelli M; Iwaki LC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 26888242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Carrafiello G; Dizonno M; Colli V; Strocchi S; Pozzi Taubert S; Leonardi A; Giorgianni A; Barresi M; Macchi A; Bracchi E; Conte L; Fugazzola C
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):600-11. PubMed ID: 20177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging.
    Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM; Rice D; Ordinola-Zapata R; Alvares Capelozza AL; Bramante CM; Jaramillo D; Christensen H
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study.
    Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 29040707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
    Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.