178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27653469)
1. Developing particle emission inventories using remote sensing (PEIRS).
Tang CH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Lyapustin AI; Di Q; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 27653469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends and spatial patterns of fine-resolution aerosol optical depth-derived PM
Tang CH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Di Q; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 27624350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical remote sensing to quantify fugitive particulate mass emissions from stationary short-term and mobile continuous sources: part II. Field applications.
Du K; Yuen W; Wang W; Rood MJ; Varma RM; Hashmonay RA; Kim BJ; Kemme MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):666-72. PubMed ID: 21142143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the crop residue and rangeland burning in the 2014 National Emissions Inventory using information from multiple sources.
Pouliot G; Rao V; McCarty JL; Soja A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 May; 67(5):613-622. PubMed ID: 27964698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial scales of pollution from variable resolution satellite imaging.
Chudnovsky AA; Kostinski A; Lyapustin A; Koutrakis P
Environ Pollut; 2013 Jan; 172():131-8. PubMed ID: 23026774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing the Applicability of Satellite Remote Sensing for PM2.5 Estimation Using MODIS Deep Blue AOD and Land Use Regression in California, United States.
Lee HJ; Chatfield RB; Strawa AW
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(12):6546-55. PubMed ID: 27218887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method to compare vehicle emissions measured by remote sensing and laboratory testing: high-emitters and potential implications for emission inventories.
Smit R; Bluett J
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jun; 409(13):2626-34. PubMed ID: 21514628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A tunnel study to estimate emission factors from mobile sources in Monterrey, Mexico.
Mancilla Y; Araizaga AE; Mendoza A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Dec; 62(12):1431-42. PubMed ID: 23362762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Top-down vehicle emission inventory for spatial distribution and dispersion modeling of particulate matter.
Andreão WL; Alonso MF; Kumar P; Pinto JA; Pedruzzi R; de Almeida Albuquerque TT
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):35952-35970. PubMed ID: 32219651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fine particulate matter emissions inventories: comparisons of emissions estimates with observations from recent field programs.
Simon H; Allen DT; Wittig AE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Feb; 58(2):320-43. PubMed ID: 18318344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of primary and secondary ambient particle trends using satellite aerosol optical depth and ground speciation data in the New England region, United States.
Lee HJ; Kang CM; Coull BA; Bell ML; Koutrakis P
Environ Res; 2014 Aug; 133():103-10. PubMed ID: 24906074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of daily fine particulate matter concentrations using aerosol optical depth retrievals from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES).
Chudnovsky AA; Lee HJ; Kostinski A; Kotlov T; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1022-31. PubMed ID: 23019816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: have we reached the promised land?
Hidy GM; Brook JR; Chow JC; Green M; Husar RB; Lee C; Scheffe RD; Swanson A; Watson JG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Oct; 59(10):1130-9. PubMed ID: 19842321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating spatiotemporal distribution of PM
Chen G; Knibbs LD; Zhang W; Li S; Cao W; Guo J; Ren H; Wang B; Wang H; Williams G; Hamm NAS; Guo Y
Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():1086-1094. PubMed ID: 29033176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-level PM
Xu Y; Ho HC; Wong MS; Deng C; Shi Y; Chan TC; Knudby A
Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt B):1417-1426. PubMed ID: 30142557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
