167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27655477)
1. Validation of the Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity among free-living adolescents.
Schneider M; Chau L
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Sep; 9(1):448. PubMed ID: 27655477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment.
Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica.
Chandrasekar A; Hensor EMA; Mackie SL; Backhouse MR; Harris E
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():339-345. PubMed ID: 29427859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validation of Fibit Zip™ physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity.
Tully MA; McBride C; Heron L; Hunter RF
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():952. PubMed ID: 25539733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals.
Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.
Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.
Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical activity among children: objective measurements using Fitbit One
Hamari L; Kullberg T; Ruohonen J; Heinonen OJ; Díaz-Rodríguez N; Lilius J; Pakarinen A; Myllymäki A; Leppänen V; Salanterä S
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):161. PubMed ID: 28427441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Fitbit's active minutes as compared with a research-grade accelerometer and self-reported measures.
Brewer W; Swanson BT; Ortiz A
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2017; 3(1):e000254. PubMed ID: 29018543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
