181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27655581)
1. [The accuracy of mammography screening for breast cancer: a Meta-analysis].
Zhu C; Wang L; Du LB; Li J; Zhang J; Dai M; Shi JF
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 27655581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy evaluation of mammography in the breast cancer screening in Asian women: a community-based follow-up study and meta analysis].
Kang M; Pang Y; Li JY; Liu LH; Liu XT
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 32(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 20450591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in combination with mammography for breast cancer within 2 cm: a meta-analysis].
Lin H; Lin H; Liang H
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1699-703. PubMed ID: 24273283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo L; Yu Y; Yang F; Gao W; Wang Y; Xiao Y; Du J; Tian J; Yang H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 May; 136(9):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 37101352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Xiang W; Rao H; Zhou L
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 32233072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis].
Pei Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; He S; Zhou J; Jiang H; Wang X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jan; 32(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32148240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of serum Cyfra21-1 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cui C; Sun X; Zhang J; Han D; Gu J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C131-4. PubMed ID: 25450270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Accuracy of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasm: a subgroup Meta-analysis].
Yu HH; Huang HY; Jiang YS; Zhu C; Guo CG; Dai M; Xing XJ; Shi JF
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 38(6):814-820. PubMed ID: 28647989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu J; Lei J; Ou Y; Zhao Y; Tuo X; Zhang B; Shen M
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Oct; 23(6):2341-2356. PubMed ID: 36242643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography With SonoVue in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
Lu J; Zhou P; Jin C; Xu L; Zhu X; Lian Q; Gong X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820971583. PubMed ID: 33308040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of Serum Pepsinogens as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Huang YK; Yu JC; Kang WM; Ma ZQ; Ye X; Tian SB; Yan C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142080. PubMed ID: 26556485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation on the accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound being used in the breast cancer screening program in women from Asian countries: a systematic review].
Huang Y; Pang Y; Wang Q; Li JY
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 31(11):1296-9. PubMed ID: 21176697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu X; Huang JM; Zhang K; Xia LJ; Feng L; Yang P; Zhang MY; Xiao W; Lin HX; Yu YH
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(5):e985-e995. PubMed ID: 29983379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer detection: An update meta-analysis.
Dong H; Kang L; Cheng S; Zhang R
Thorac Cancer; 2021 Dec; 12(23):3201-3207. PubMed ID: 34668649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
