184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656055)
1. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining the working length in teeth with simulated apical root resorption: An in vitro study.
Saraswathi V; Kedia A; Purayil TP; Ballal V; Saini A
J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(5):402-5. PubMed ID: 27656055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Different Apex Locators in Teeth with Simulated Apical Root Resorption: an In Vitro Study.
Jadhav GR; Mittal P; Patil V; Kandekar P; Kulkarni A; Shinde S; Syed S; Elahi S
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2018 Dec; 60(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 31188764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of 2 electronic Apex locators with conventional radiography: an ex vivo study.
Khandewal D; Ballal NV; Saraswathi MV
J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 25476973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Four Apex Locators in Premolars with Root Resorption: An
López-Maekawa A; García Rupay CR
Iran Endod J; 2022; 17(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 36703871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Working Length Determination using NovApex and Root-ZX Apex Locators: An in vitro Study.
Zand V; Rahimi S; Davoudi P; Afshang A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 May; 18(5):383-385. PubMed ID: 28512277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Different Apex Locators: Propex IQ, Raypex 6, Root ZX, and Apex ID with CBCT and Periapical Radiograph-In Vitro Study.
Mahmoud O; Awad Abdelmagied MH; Dandashi AH; Jasim BN; Tawfik Kayali HA; Al Shehadat S
Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():5563426. PubMed ID: 34054960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of Root ZX and Raypex 6 in teeth with different apical diameters.
Aydin U; Karataslioglu E; Aksoy F; Yildirim C
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 25657531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Raypex 5 and the Mini Apex Locator: an in vivo study.
Stöber EK; de Ribot J; Mercadé M; Vera J; Bueno R; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1349-52. PubMed ID: 21924180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Apical Patency on Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locators: In Vitro Study.
Abdelsalam N; Hashem N
J Endod; 2020 Apr; 46(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 32089336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Four Electronic Apex Locators in Detecting Working Length: An Ex Vivo Study.
Yolagiden M; Ersahan S; Suyun G; Bilgec E; Aydin C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 30713168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative assessment of the accuracies of Raypex 5, Raypex 6, iPex and iPex II electronic apex locators: An in vitro study.
Gurel MA; Helvacioglu Kivanc B; Ekici A
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent; 2017; 51(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 28955583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Siu C; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 19567315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.
Vieyra JP; Acosta J
Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 21306402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical accuracy of two electronic apex locators in teeth with large periapical lesions.
Çalışkan MK; Kaval ME; Tekin U
Int Endod J; 2014 Oct; 47(10):920-5. PubMed ID: 24354401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators - An In Vitro Study.
Golvankar K; Kader MA; Latheef AA; Ali ABM; Abullais SS; Sibagathullah M
Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 7(19):3276-3280. PubMed ID: 31949530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Three Types of Apex Locators versus Digital Periapical Radiography for Working Length Determination in Maxillary Premolars: An In Vitro Study.
Ramezani M; Bolbolian M; Aliakbari M; Alizadeh A; Tofangchiha M; Faegh SM; Patini R; D'Amato G
Clin Pract; 2022 Dec; 12(6):1043-1053. PubMed ID: 36547115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth.
Leonardo MR; Silva LA; Nelson-Filho P; Silva RA; Raffaini MS
Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 18217990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Invitro Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Electronic Apex Locators to Determine Working Length in the Presence of Various Irrigants.
Prasad AB; Harshit S; Aastha SA; Deepak R
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2016 Sep; 26(5):457-462. PubMed ID: 28446851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of two forms of chlorhexidine on the accuracy of contemporary electronic apex locators.
Marek E; Łagocka R; Kot K; Woźniak K; Lipski M
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 20(1):3. PubMed ID: 31892327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of third generation versus fourth generation electronic apex locators in detecting apical constriction: An in vivo study.
Swapna DV; Krishna A; Patil AC; Rashmi K; Pai VS; Ranjini MA
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 26180412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
