These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656071)

  • 1. Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals.
    Navós BV; Hoppe CB; Mestieri LB; Böttcher DE; Só MV; Grecca FS
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 27656071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
    Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multidimensional Analysis of Curved Root Canal Preparation Using Continuous or Reciprocating Nickel-titanium Instruments.
    Mamede-Neto I; Borges ÁH; Alencar AHG; Duarte MAH; Sousa Neto MD; Estrela C
    Open Dent J; 2018; 12():32-45. PubMed ID: 29456772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micro-computed Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 5 Rotary and Reciprocating Systems with Different Metallurgical Properties and Surface Treatments in Curved Root Canals.
    Kabil E; Katić M; Anić I; Bago I
    J Endod; 2021 Mar; 47(3):477-484. PubMed ID: 33217469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping Ability of Reciproc R25 File and Mtwo System Used in Continuous and Reciprocating Motion.
    Campanella V; Gianni L; Libonati A; Gallusi G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 32381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Arslan H; Yildiz ED; Gunduz HA; Sumbullu M; Bayrakdar IS; Karatas E; Sumbullu MA
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(4):222-224. PubMed ID: 29259355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study.
    Mustafa M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 35656678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions.
    Hoppe CB; Böttcher DE; Justo AM; Só MV; Grecca FS
    Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 26750106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
    Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
    Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
    Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography.
    You SY; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1296-300. PubMed ID: 21846553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Pedullà E; Plotino G; Grande NM; Avarotti G; Gambarini G; Rapisarda E; Mannocci F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 26876735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Analysis of Canal Centering Ability of Different Single File Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- An In-Vitro Study.
    Agarwal RS; Agarwal J; Jain P; Chandra A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC06-10. PubMed ID: 26155551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of apical transportation and centering ability of Mtwo and Reciproc R25 in severely curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mesgarani A; Hamidi MR; Haghanifar S; Naiemi S; Bijani A
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2018; 15(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29497448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canals.
    Naseri M; Paymanpour P; Kangarloo A; Haddadpur S; Dianat O; Ketabi MA
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 26962310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc and One Shape File Systems Using CBCT-An In Vitro Study.
    Mittal A; Dadu S; Singh NS; Singh S; Gupta B; Abraham A; Yendrembam B; Kumari S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC31-ZC34. PubMed ID: 28571257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.