These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656550)

  • 1. An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer.
    Shakya VK; Gupta P; Tikku AP; Pathak AK; Chandra A; Yadav RK; Bharti R; Singh RK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Aug; 10(8):ZC104-8. PubMed ID: 27656550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against
    Poggio C; Trovati F; Ceci M; Colombo M; Pietrocola G
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Jun; 9(6):e743-e748. PubMed ID: 28638549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Endodontic Sealers against
    Dalmia S; Gaikwad A; Samuel R; Aher G; Gulve M; Kolhe S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 29780734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.
    Nawal RR; Parande M; Sehgal R; Naik A; Rao NR
    Int Endod J; 2011 Apr; 44(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 21219358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques.
    Camilleri J
    J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 25115660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-Term Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers Against
    Šimundić Munitić M; Budimir A; Jakovljević S; Anić I; Bago I
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2020 Mar; 54(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 32523152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data on the push-out bond strength of three different root canal treatment sealers.
    Kurup D; Nagpal AK; Shetty S; Mandal TK; Anand J; Mitra R
    Bioinformation; 2021; 17(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 34393420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study on the effects of serum proteins on Enterococcus faecalis adhesion to three types of root sealers and gutta-percha.
    Lin X; Chi D; Gong Q; Tong Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):622. PubMed ID: 34876112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An
    Madla-Cruz E; Villanueva-Pérez VD; De la Garza-Ramos MA; Flores-Treviño JJ; Rodríguez-Delgado I; López-Martinez F
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2024; 11():40646. PubMed ID: 38903776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Hasheminia M; Razavian H; Mosleh H; Shakerian B
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28348620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Marginal Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study.
    Remy V; Krishnan V; Job TV; Ravisankar MS; Raj CVR; John S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 29208787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.
    Wang Z; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 24666900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals.
    Jafari F; Samadi Kafil H; Jafari S; Aghazadeh M; Momeni T
    Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 27471530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of four endodontic sealers.
    Huang Y; Li X; Mandal P; Wu Y; Liu L; Gui H; Liu J
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31215426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antibacterial effect of different root canal sealers on three bacterial species.
    Heyder M; Kranz S; Völpel A; Pfister W; Watts DC; Jandt KD; Sigusch BW
    Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 23523285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers.
    Morgental RD; Vier-Pelisser FV; Oliveira SD; Antunes FC; Cogo DM; Kopper PM
    Int Endod J; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1128-33. PubMed ID: 21895702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study.
    Hakke Patil A; Patil AG; Shaikh S; Bhandarkar S; Moharir A; Sharma A
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52201. PubMed ID: 38347990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow characteristics of two epoxy resin-based sealers-AH plus and Perma Evolution: An
    Tiwari S; Murthy CS; Usha HL; Shivekshith AK; Kumar NN; Vijayalakshmi L
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(6):676-680. PubMed ID: 30546218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of two different root canal sealers on treatment outcome and post-obturation pain in single-visit root canal treatment: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Coşar M; Kandemir Demirci G; Çalışkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2023 Mar; 56(3):318-330. PubMed ID: 36385378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial effects of MTA- Fillapex and BIO-C® sealer at different time intervals.
    Raouf SH; Bakr DK; Ahmed UM; Amin BK
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2023 Apr; 69(4):116-119. PubMed ID: 37329538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.