232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656851)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.
Badan GM; Roveda D; Paito S; Fleury Ede F; Maragno B; Campos MS; Ferreira CA; Ferreira FA
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016; 62(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 27656851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-guided quadrantectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ detected preoperatively by mammographic calcifications.
Sakakibara M; Yokomizo J; Shiina N; Kazama T; Nakamura R; Fujimoto H; Nagashima T; Takishima H; Nakatani Y; Miyazaki M
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Aug; 219(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 24880957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.
Hermann G; Keller RJ; Drossman S; Caravella BA; Tartter P; Panetta RA; Bleiweiss IJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 10459309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy.
Liberman L; LaTrenta LR; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 9169687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient age and tumor size determine the cancer yield of preoperative bilateral breast MRI in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bae MS; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Seo M; Park IA; Han W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 23971464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with a needle core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: is it justified?
Doyle B; Al-Mudhaffer M; Kennedy MM; O'Doherty A; Flanagan F; McDermott EW; Kerin MJ; Hill AD; Quinn CM
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 19190009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication].
Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Fischmann A; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12525989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
