These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656873)

  • 1. The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.
    Kinoshita S; De Wit B; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):369-384. PubMed ID: 27656873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupillary Stroop effects.
    Laeng B; Ørbo M; Holmlund T; Miozzo M
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20865297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences between Chinese morphosyllabic and German alphabetic readers in the Stroop interference effect.
    Saalbach H; Stern E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Aug; 11(4):709-15. PubMed ID: 15581122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task.
    Keha E; Kalanthroff E
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1208-1218. PubMed ID: 36109353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological encoding in the oral but not manual Stroop task: Evidence for the role of a speech production process.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1494-1504. PubMed ID: 32105148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task.
    Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.
    Plummer P; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):275-83. PubMed ID: 23937235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reverse Stroop effect.
    Durgin FH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Mar; 7(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 10780025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.
    Saunders DR; Melcher D; van Zoest W
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):852-862. PubMed ID: 28852867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibitory modulation of speech trajectories: Evidence from a vowel-modified Stroop task.
    Beach SD; Niziolek CA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2024; 41(1-2):51-69. PubMed ID: 38778635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the automaticity of reading: Electrophysiological recordings show that stroop words capture spatial attention.
    Lowery A; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 35913878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.