These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27656873)

  • 21. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    White D; Besner D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.
    MacLeod CM; Hodder SL
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 9584430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 16035346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Interference in the Stroop color-naming task].
    Yamazaki A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1985 Oct; 56(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 4094196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue. An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words.
    Barbet C; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():58-68. PubMed ID: 29653397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence accumulation in the integrated and primed Stroop tasks.
    Kinoshita S; de Wit B; Aji M; Norris D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):824-836. PubMed ID: 28364405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroop-like effects in a new-code learning task: A cognitive load theory perspective.
    Hazan-Liran B; Miller P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1878-1891. PubMed ID: 27434675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An electrophysiological investigation of the role of orthography in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words.
    Wang K
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 20974216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stroop interference depends also on the level of automaticity of the to-be-interfered process.
    Grégoire L; Poulin-Charronnat B; Perruchet P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():143-152. PubMed ID: 31154090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference.
    Masson ME; Bub DN; Ishigami Y
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2012-8. PubMed ID: 18265616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A sensory origin for color-word Stroop effects in aging: a meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 Sep; 16(5):505-34. PubMed ID: 19479479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroop interference and food intake.
    Overduin J; Jansen A; Louwerse E
    Int J Eat Disord; 1995 Nov; 18(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 8556024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words.
    Judge J; Taylor PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2008-17. PubMed ID: 22524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
    Kahneman D; Chajczyk D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 6224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.