These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27657439)

  • 1. Thinking outside the box when reading aloud: Between (localist) module connection strength as a source of word frequency effects.
    Besner D; Risko EF
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Oct; 123(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 27657439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the strength of connections between localist mental modules as a source of frequency-of-occurrence effects.
    Besner D; Moroz S; O'Malley S
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 21285440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ; Hockley WE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 27244357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational modelling of the effects of semantic dementia on visual word recognition.
    Coltheart M; Saunders SJ; Tree JJ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 27(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 20658385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the dominance of whole-word knowledge in reading aloud.
    Visser TA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 11700908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
    Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
    Cortese MJ; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):106-51. PubMed ID: 20510406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in reading aloud: a mega-study, item effects, and some models.
    Adelman JS; Sabatos-DeVito MG; Marquis SJ; Estes Z
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Feb; 68():113-60. PubMed ID: 24300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading aloud: new evidence for contextual control over the breadth of lexical activation.
    Reynolds M; Besner D; Coltheart M
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1332-47. PubMed ID: 21830161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
    Besner D; Wartak S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 18248152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
    Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linguistic Markers of Inference Generation While Reading.
    Clinton V; Carlson SE; Seipel B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Jun; 45(3):553-74. PubMed ID: 25833811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.