These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27658227)

  • 1. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
    Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye glances towards conflict-relevant cues: the roles of anticipatory competence and driver experience.
    Stahl P; Donmez B; Jamieson GA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105255. PubMed ID: 31415996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities.
    Hajiseyedjavadi F; Zhang T; Agrawal R; Knodler M; Fisher D; Samuel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():41-52. PubMed ID: 29277384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.