These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27658902)

  • 21. Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis.
    Voyer D; Jansen P
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():110-124. PubMed ID: 28437638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: neural correlates and gender differences.
    Derntl B; Finkelmeyer A; Eickhoff S; Kellermann T; Falkenberg DI; Schneider F; Habel U
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jan; 35(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 19914001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.
    Gunalp P; Moossaian T; Hegarty M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30783909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confidence mediates the sex difference in mental rotation performance.
    Estes Z; Felker S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):557-70. PubMed ID: 22130691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender-specific strategy use and neural correlates in a spatial perspective taking task.
    Kaiser S; Walther S; Nennig E; Kronmüller K; Mundt C; Weisbrod M; Stippich C; Vogeley K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2524-31. PubMed ID: 18514745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Childhood wayfinding experience explains sex and individual differences in adult wayfinding strategy and anxiety.
    Vieites V; Pruden SM; Reeb-Sutherland BC
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Mar; 5(1):12. PubMed ID: 32185533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability.
    Mäntylä T
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 23462757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sex differences in spatial memory using serial and search tasks.
    Shah DS; Prados J; Gamble J; De Lillo C; Gibson CL
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():90-9. PubMed ID: 24076150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty.
    Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stereotype threat and executive functions: which functions mediate different threat-related outcomes?
    Rydell RJ; Van Loo KJ; Boucher KL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Mar; 40(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 24345711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of a classroom intervention with spatial play materials on children's object and viewer transformation abilities.
    Vander Heyden KM; Huizinga M; Jolles J
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Feb; 53(2):290-305. PubMed ID: 27831702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prenatal testosterone does not explain sex differences in spatial ability.
    Toivainen T; Pannini G; Papageorgiou KA; Malanchini M; Rimfeld K; Shakeshaft N; Kovas Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13653. PubMed ID: 30209280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visuospatial transformations and personality: evidence of a relationship between visuospatial perspective taking and self-reported emotional empathy.
    Sulpizio V; Committeri G; Metta E; Lambrey S; Berthoz A; Galati G
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2091-102. PubMed ID: 25893909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of sex and empathy on putting oneself in the shoes of others.
    Mohr C; Rowe AC; Blanke O
    Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):277-91. PubMed ID: 19619391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.
    Surtees A; Apperly I; Samson D
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 23999408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Innovative testing of spatial ability: interactive responding and the use of complex stimuli material.
    Jelínek M; Květon P; Vobořil D
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 25362549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-individual differences in successful perspective taking during pain perception mediates emotional responsiveness in self and others: an fMRI study.
    van der Heiden L; Scherpiet S; Konicar L; Birbaumer N; Veit R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():387-94. PubMed ID: 23063451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex Differences in Mobility and Spatial Cognition: A Test of the Fertility and Parental Care Hypothesis in Northwestern Namibia.
    Vashro L; Padilla L; Cashdan E
    Hum Nat; 2016 Mar; 27(1):16-34. PubMed ID: 26577341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Embodied spatial cognition.
    Trafton JG; Harrison AM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):686-706. PubMed ID: 25164505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual differences in emerging adults' spatial abilities: What role do affective factors play?
    Desme CJ; Dick AS; Hayes TB; Pruden SM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):13. PubMed ID: 38499841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.