These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27659089)

  • 41. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
    Henao SP; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions.
    Kaygisiz E; Uzuner FD; Yuksel S; Taner L; Çulhaoğlu R; Sezgin Y; Ateş C
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25101909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
    Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
    Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of bracket type on the external apical root resorption in class I extraction patients - a retrospective study.
    Qin F; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Mar; 19(1):53. PubMed ID: 30922294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [The clinical implication of self-ligating brackets].
    Yu YL; Qian YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Aug; 16(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 17924034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal status.
    Uzuner FD; Kaygisiz E; Cankaya ZT
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1062-7. PubMed ID: 24731062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.
    Holtmann S; Konermann A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Montasser M; El-Bialy T; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stability comparison of two different dentoalveolar expansion treatment protocols.
    Atik E; Taner T
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(5):75-82. PubMed ID: 29160347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review.
    Dehbi H; Azaroual MF; Zaoui F; Halimi A; Benyahia H
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 28778722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
    Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of intrusion combined with anterior retraction on apical root resorption.
    Martins DR; Tibola D; Janson G; Maria FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21389075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Analysis of the effect of relieving dental crowding by using a newly designed low frictional force single-wing bracket on typodont model].
    Zhou JG; Feng JY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):608-10. PubMed ID: 22241309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of mild Class III malocclusion with two different bracket systems.
    Aragón MLC; Bichara LM; Flores-Mir C; Almeida G; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):49-55. PubMed ID: 29364379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.