157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27659451)
1. PSSV: a novel pattern-based probabilistic approach for somatic structural variation identification.
Chen X; Shi X; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Xuan J
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27659451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DM-BLD: differential methylation detection using a hierarchical Bayesian model exploiting local dependency.
Wang X; Gu J; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 27616707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data.
Fang L; Kao C; Gonzalez MV; Mafra FA; Pellegrino da Silva R; Li M; Wenzel SS; Wimmer K; Hakonarson H; Wang K
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5585. PubMed ID: 31811119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. JointSNVMix: a probabilistic model for accurate detection of somatic mutations in normal/tumour paired next-generation sequencing data.
Roth A; Ding J; Morin R; Crisan A; Ha G; Giuliany R; Bashashati A; Hirst M; Turashvili G; Oloumi A; Marra MA; Aparicio S; Shah SP
Bioinformatics; 2012 Apr; 28(7):907-13. PubMed ID: 22285562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seeksv: an accurate tool for somatic structural variation and virus integration detection.
Liang Y; Qiu K; Liao B; Zhu W; Huang X; Li L; Chen X; Li K
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 27634948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust identification of transcriptional regulatory networks using a Gibbs sampler on outlier sum statistic.
Gu J; Xuan J; Riggins RB; Chen L; Wang Y; Clarke R
Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 28(15):1990-7. PubMed ID: 22595208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GASOLINE: detecting germline and somatic structural variants from long-reads data.
Magi A; Mattei G; Mingrino A; Caprioli C; Ronchini C; Frigè G; Semeraro R; Baragli M; Bolognini D; Colombo E; Mazzarella L; Pelicci PG
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20817. PubMed ID: 38012350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating somatic tumor mutation detection without matched normal samples.
Teer JK; Zhang Y; Chen L; Welsh EA; Cress WD; Eschrich SA; Berglund AE
Hum Genomics; 2017 Sep; 11(1):22. PubMed ID: 28870239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SoloDel: a probabilistic model for detecting low-frequent somatic deletions from unmatched sequencing data.
Kim J; Kim S; Nam H; Kim S; Lee D
Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3105-13. PubMed ID: 26071141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meltos: multi-sample tumor phylogeny reconstruction for structural variants.
Ricketts C; Seidman D; Popic V; Hormozdiari F; Batzoglou S; Hajirasouliha I
Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 31584621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. svpluscnv: analysis and visualization of complex structural variation data.
Lopez G; Egolf LE; Giorgi FM; Diskin SJ; Margolin AA
Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(13):1912-1914. PubMed ID: 33051644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BSSV: Bayesian based somatic structural variation identification with whole genome DNA-seq data.
Chen X; Shi X; Shajahan AN; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():3937-40. PubMed ID: 25570853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BACOM: in silico detection of genomic deletion types and correction of normal cell contamination in copy number data.
Yu G; Zhang B; Bova GS; Xu J; Shih IeM; Wang Y
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(11):1473-80. PubMed ID: 21498400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CRNET: an efficient sampling approach to infer functional regulatory networks by integrating large-scale ChIP-seq and time-course RNA-seq data.
Chen X; Gu J; Wang X; Jung JG; Wang TL; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 34(10):1733-1740. PubMed ID: 29280996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumour procurement, DNA extraction, coverage analysis and optimisation of mutation-detection algorithms for human melanoma genomes.
Wilmott JS; Field MA; Johansson PA; Kakavand H; Shang P; De Paoli-Iseppi R; Vilain RE; Pupo GM; Tembe V; Jakrot V; Shang CA; Cebon J; Shackleton M; Fitzgerald A; Thompson JF; Hayward NK; Mann GJ; Scolyer RA
Pathology; 2015 Dec; 47(7):683-93. PubMed ID: 26517638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SV-Bay: structural variant detection in cancer genomes using a Bayesian approach with correction for GC-content and read mappability.
Iakovishina D; Janoueix-Lerosey I; Barillot E; Regnier M; Boeva V
Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):984-92. PubMed ID: 26740523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ulysses: accurate detection of low-frequency structural variations in large insert-size sequencing libraries.
Gillet-Markowska A; Richard H; Fischer G; Lafontaine I
Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 25380961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples.
Smith KS; Yadav VK; Pei S; Pollyea DA; Jordan CT; De S
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):808-13. PubMed ID: 26589277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
