These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27659451)

  • 41. FaSD-somatic: a fast and accurate somatic SNV detection algorithm for cancer genome sequencing data.
    Wang W; Wang P; Xu F; Luo R; Wong MP; Lam TW; Wang J
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2498-500. PubMed ID: 24833803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
    Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cancer mutational signatures representation by large-scale context embedding.
    Zhang Y; Xiao Y; Yang M; Ma J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i309-i316. PubMed ID: 32657413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An integrative somatic mutation analysis to identify pathways linked with survival outcomes across 19 cancer types.
    Park S; Kim SJ; Yu D; Peña-Llopis S; Gao J; Park JS; Chen B; Norris J; Wang X; Chen M; Kim M; Yong J; Wardak Z; Choe K; Story M; Starr T; Cheong JH; Hwang TH
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1643-51. PubMed ID: 26635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Local sequence assembly reveals a high-resolution profile of somatic structural variations in 97 cancer genomes.
    Zhuang J; Weng Z
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Sep; 43(17):8146-56. PubMed ID: 26283183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. multiSNV: a probabilistic approach for improving detection of somatic point mutations from multiple related tumour samples.
    Josephidou M; Lynch AG; Tavaré S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 May; 43(9):e61. PubMed ID: 25722372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PINCAGE: probabilistic integration of cancer genomics data for perturbed gene identification and sample classification.
    Świtnicki MP; Juul M; Madsen T; Sørensen KD; Pedersen JS
    Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 32(9):1353-65. PubMed ID: 26740525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patterns and mechanisms of structural variations in human cancer.
    Yi K; Ju YS
    Exp Mol Med; 2018 Aug; 50(8):1-11. PubMed ID: 30089796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Conpair: concordance and contamination estimator for matched tumor-normal pairs.
    Bergmann EA; Chen BJ; Arora K; Vacic V; Zody MC
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(20):3196-3198. PubMed ID: 27354699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PRISM: pair-read informed split-read mapping for base-pair level detection of insertion, deletion and structural variants.
    Jiang Y; Wang Y; Brudno M
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(20):2576-83. PubMed ID: 22851530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data.
    Larson DE; Harris CC; Chen K; Koboldt DC; Abbott TE; Dooling DJ; Ley TJ; Mardis ER; Wilson RK; Ding L
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Feb; 28(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 22155872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Next generation mapping reveals novel large genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.
    Jaratlerdsiri W; Chan EKF; Petersen DC; Yang C; Croucher PI; Bornman MSR; Sheth P; Hayes VM
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23588-23602. PubMed ID: 28423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. AutoCSA, an algorithm for high throughput DNA sequence variant detection in cancer genomes.
    Dicks E; Teague JW; Stephens P; Raine K; Yates A; Mattocks C; Tarpey P; Butler A; Menzies A; Richardson D; Jenkinson A; Davies H; Edkins S; Forbes S; Gray K; Greenman C; Shepherd R; Stratton MR; Futreal PA; Wooster R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1689-91. PubMed ID: 17485433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cancer driver gene discovery through an integrative genomics approach in a non-parametric Bayesian framework.
    Yang H; Wei Q; Zhong X; Yang H; Li B
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 27797769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. tHapMix: simulating tumour samples through haplotype mixtures.
    Ivakhno S; Colombo C; Tanner S; Tedder P; Berri S; Cox AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):280-282. PubMed ID: 27605106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human breast cancers.
    Tseng LM; Yin PH; Yang CW; Tsai YF; Hsu CY; Chi CW; Lee HC
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2011 Oct; 50(10):800-11. PubMed ID: 21748819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. SVScore: an impact prediction tool for structural variation.
    Ganel L; Abel HJ; ; Hall IM
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):1083-1085. PubMed ID: 28031184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. MutEnricher: a flexible toolset for somatic mutation enrichment analysis of tumor whole genomes.
    Soltis AR; Dalgard CL; Pollard HB; Wilkerson MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):338. PubMed ID: 32736515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Structural Variation in Cancer: Role, Prevalence, and Mechanisms.
    Cosenza MR; Rodriguez-Martin B; Korbel JO
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2022 Aug; 23():123-152. PubMed ID: 35655332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comprehensive scanning of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in breast cancer.
    Tan DJ; Bai RK; Wong LJ
    Cancer Res; 2002 Feb; 62(4):972-6. PubMed ID: 11861366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.