These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27660141)

  • 1. Correlation Between SUVmax and CT Radiomic Analysis Using Lymph Node Density in PET/CT-Based Lymph Node Staging.
    Giesel FL; Schneider F; Kratochwil C; Rath D; Moltz J; Holland-Letz T; Kauczor HU; Schwartz LH; Haberkorn U; Flechsig P
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 58(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 27660141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The diagnostic ability of
    Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiomic Analysis using Density Threshold for FDG-PET/CT-Based N-Staging in Lung Cancer Patients.
    Flechsig P; Frank P; Kratochwil C; Antoch G; Rath D; Moltz J; Rieser M; Warth A; Kauczor HU; Schwartz LH; Haberkorn U; Giesel FL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Apr; 19(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 27539308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential diagnosis between (18)F-FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer and benign nodes on dual-time point PET/CT scan.
    Suga K; Kawakami Y; Hiyama A; Sugi K; Okabe K; Matsumoto T; Ueda K; Tanaka N; Matsunaga N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 23(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19444550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
    Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
    Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of net influx constant based on FDG PET/CT dynamic imaging in the differential diagnosis of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in lung cancer.
    Wumener X; Zhang Y; Zang Z; Ye X; Zhao J; Zhao J; Liang Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Nov; 38(11):904-912. PubMed ID: 39078558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
    Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Accuracy of
    Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
    Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Bladder Cancer using Maximum Standardised Uptake Value and
    Vind-Kezunovic S; Bouchelouche K; Ipsen P; Høyer S; Bell C; Bjerggaard Jensen J
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28753817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative volumetric CT-histogram analysis in N-staging of 18F-FDG-equivocal patients with lung cancer.
    Flechsig P; Kratochwil C; Schwartz LH; Rath D; Moltz J; Antoch G; Heussel CP; Rieser M; Warth A; Zabeck H; Kauczor HU; Haberkorn U; Giesel FL
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 24525209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Dual-Timepoint
    Collarino A; Garganese G; Valdés Olmos RA; Stefanelli A; Perotti G; Mirk P; Fragomeni SM; Ieria FP; Scambia G; Giordano A; Rufini V
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1913-1918. PubMed ID: 28546331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.
    Vansteenkiste JF; Stroobants SG; De Leyn PR; Dupont PJ; Bogaert J; Maes A; Deneffe GJ; Nackaerts KL; Verschakelen JA; Lerut TE; Mortelmans LA; Demedts MG
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jun; 16(6):2142-9. PubMed ID: 9626214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pelvic Lymph Node Staging by Combined
    Pichler R; De Zordo T; Fritz J; Kroiss A; Aigner F; Heidegger I; Virgolini I; Horninger W; Uprimny C
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):e387-e395. PubMed ID: 27601364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated analysis of
    Girard A; Rouanne M; Taconet S; Radulescu C; Neuzillet Y; Girma A; Beaufrere A; Lebret T; Le Stanc E; Grellier JF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4286-4293. PubMed ID: 30666449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axillary lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance mammography: a prospective comparative study with FDG PET-CT and healthy women.
    Krammer J; Wasser K; Schnitzer A; Henzler T; Schoenberg SO; Kaiser CG
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2194-8. PubMed ID: 23993142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
    Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated FDG-PET/CT compared with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with resectable early stage esophageal cancer.
    Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Kuwabara M; Shimono T; Hosono M; Shiozaki H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 23(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19205841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.