411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27660141)
1. Correlation Between SUVmax and CT Radiomic Analysis Using Lymph Node Density in PET/CT-Based Lymph Node Staging.
Giesel FL; Schneider F; Kratochwil C; Rath D; Moltz J; Holland-Letz T; Kauczor HU; Schwartz LH; Haberkorn U; Flechsig P
J Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 58(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 27660141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiomic Analysis using Density Threshold for FDG-PET/CT-Based N-Staging in Lung Cancer Patients.
Flechsig P; Frank P; Kratochwil C; Antoch G; Rath D; Moltz J; Rieser M; Warth A; Kauczor HU; Schwartz LH; Haberkorn U; Giesel FL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Apr; 19(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 27539308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis between (18)F-FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer and benign nodes on dual-time point PET/CT scan.
Suga K; Kawakami Y; Hiyama A; Sugi K; Okabe K; Matsumoto T; Ueda K; Tanaka N; Matsunaga N
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 23(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19444550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Vinsensia M; Chyoke PL; Hadaschik B; Holland-Letz T; Moltz J; Kopka K; Rauscher I; Mier W; Schwaiger M; Haberkorn U; Mauer T; Kratochwil C; Eiber M; Giesel FL
J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 28637799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Bladder Cancer using Maximum Standardised Uptake Value and
Vind-Kezunovic S; Bouchelouche K; Ipsen P; Høyer S; Bell C; Bjerggaard Jensen J
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28753817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative volumetric CT-histogram analysis in N-staging of 18F-FDG-equivocal patients with lung cancer.
Flechsig P; Kratochwil C; Schwartz LH; Rath D; Moltz J; Antoch G; Heussel CP; Rieser M; Warth A; Zabeck H; Kauczor HU; Haberkorn U; Giesel FL
J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 24525209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Dual-Timepoint
Collarino A; Garganese G; Valdés Olmos RA; Stefanelli A; Perotti G; Mirk P; Fragomeni SM; Ieria FP; Scambia G; Giordano A; Rufini V
J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1913-1918. PubMed ID: 28546331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.
Vansteenkiste JF; Stroobants SG; De Leyn PR; Dupont PJ; Bogaert J; Maes A; Deneffe GJ; Nackaerts KL; Verschakelen JA; Lerut TE; Mortelmans LA; Demedts MG
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jun; 16(6):2142-9. PubMed ID: 9626214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic Lymph Node Staging by Combined
Pichler R; De Zordo T; Fritz J; Kroiss A; Aigner F; Heidegger I; Virgolini I; Horninger W; Uprimny C
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):e387-e395. PubMed ID: 27601364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated analysis of
Girard A; Rouanne M; Taconet S; Radulescu C; Neuzillet Y; Girma A; Beaufrere A; Lebret T; Le Stanc E; Grellier JF
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4286-4293. PubMed ID: 30666449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axillary lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance mammography: a prospective comparative study with FDG PET-CT and healthy women.
Krammer J; Wasser K; Schnitzer A; Henzler T; Schoenberg SO; Kaiser CG
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2194-8. PubMed ID: 23993142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated FDG-PET/CT compared with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with resectable early stage esophageal cancer.
Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Kuwabara M; Shimono T; Hosono M; Shiozaki H
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 23(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19205841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
