43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2766072)
1. Survival impact of the degree of parametrial invasion on MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Himoto Y; Yamanoi K; Kurata Y
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):4001-4002. PubMed ID: 38091057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Pre-Operative Staging of Cervical Cancer Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Clinical-Surgical-Pathologic Comparison.
Ditto A; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Evangelisti G; Bogani G; Chiappa V; Martinelli F; Raspagliesi F
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37046722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gong Y; Wang Q; Dong L; Jia Y; Hua C; Mi F; Li C
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):14107-14125. PubMed ID: 27802186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thomeer MG; Gerestein C; Spronk S; van Doorn HC; van der Ham E; Hunink MG
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):2005-18. PubMed ID: 23455762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indications for endoscopy according to the revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer after MRI and CT scanning.
Jeong BK; Huh SJ; Choi DH; Park W; Oh D; Kim T; Lee HB
J Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22523622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Janus CL; Mendelson DS; Moore S; Gendal ES; Dottino P; Brodman M
Clin Imaging; 1989 Jun; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
