152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2766072)
21. Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology.
Jensen TK; Holt P; Gerke O; Riehmann M; Svolgaard B; Marcussen N; Bouchelouche K
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 21231796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study.
Choi SH; Kim SH; Choi HJ; Park BK; Lee HJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 15480035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24.
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in the staging of tumors of the urinary bladder].
Schmidt H; Beer M; Block T; Saul C; Werner R; Hahn D
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Sep; 7(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 3677546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evaluation of the role of MRI at 1.5 T in the staging of the initial extension of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Soyer P; Rigaud C; Masselot J; Michel G
J Belge Radiol; 1991 Mar; 74(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 2061275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma.
Bellomi M; Bonomo G; Landoni F; Villa G; Leon ME; Bocciolone L; Maggioni A; Viale G
Eur Radiol; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2469-74. PubMed ID: 15999213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [MR tomography in staging of carcinomas of the uterus].
Scheidler J; Heuck A; Reiser M
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):377-83. PubMed ID: 7938485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computed tomography in invasive carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal.
Villasanta U; Whitley NO; Haney PJ; Brenner D
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 6866364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Di Legge A; De Blasis I; Moruzzi MC; Bonatti M; Collarino A; Rufini V; Manfredi R
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):741-68. PubMed ID: 24861248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
