These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27661212)

  • 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage and the Relationship to Genital Hiatus and Perineal Body Measurements.
    Dunivan GC; Lyons KE; Jeppson PC; Ninivaggio CS; Komesu YM; Alba FM; Rogers RG
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 27661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should Genital Hiatus/Perineal Body Be Measured at Rest or on Valsalva?
    Ow LL; Subramaniam N; Kamisan Atan I; Friedman T; Martin A; Dietz HP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(6):415-418. PubMed ID: 29979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'.
    Dietz HP; Kamisan Atan I; Salita A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 25854801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual activity and vaginal topography in women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders.
    Edenfield AL; Levin PJ; Dieter AA; Amundsen CL; Siddiqui NY
    J Sex Med; 2015 Feb; 12(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 25293781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioperative changes in superficial pelvic organ prolapse quantification system measurements after prolapse surgery.
    Durnea CM; Basu M; Dadhwal K; Gayle YV; Gauthaman N; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 May; 145(2):239-243. PubMed ID: 30748012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size of urogenital hiatus as a potential risk factor for emptying disorders after pelvic prolapse repair.
    Ghafar MA; Chesson RR; Velasco C; Slocum P; Winters JC
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):603-7. PubMed ID: 23416637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical impact of bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor disorders.
    Vasconcelos Neto JA; Vasconcelos CTM; Regadas SMM; Bezerra LRPS; Lustosa KA; Karbage SAL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 28265708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.
    Aytan H; Tok EC; Ertunc D; Yasa O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():34-7. PubMed ID: 24314799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System.
    Sánchez-Ferrer ML; Prieto-Sánchez MT; Moya-Jiménez C; Mendiola J; García-Hernández CM; Carmona-Barnosi A; Nieto A; Torres-Cantero AM
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Sep; (139):. PubMed ID: 30295651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Severity and Genital Hiatus Size With Long-Term Pessary Use.
    Boyd SS; Subramanian D; Propst K; O'Sullivan D; Tulikangas P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e360-e362. PubMed ID: 32910077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system?
    Madhu C; Swift S; Moloney-Geany S; Drake MJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(S6):S39-S43. PubMed ID: 30614056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of successful ring pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Turel Fatakia F; Pixton S; Caudwell Hall J; Dietz HP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 60(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 32297314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparability between adult female anogenital distance and perineal measurements standardized by POP-Q system (GH and PB).
    Sánchez-Ferrer ML; Prieto-Sánchez MT; Moya-Jiménez LC; Adoamnei E; Mendiola J; Torres-Cantero AM
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Nov; 37(8):2847-2853. PubMed ID: 30136306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss.
    Lowder JL; Oliphant SS; Shepherd JP; Ghetti C; Sutkin G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):718.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26719211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native-tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair with perineorrhaphy for level III support results in reduced genital hiatus size and improved quality of life in sexually active and inactive patients.
    Mothes AR; Raguse I; Kather A; Runnebaum IB
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():144-149. PubMed ID: 36493583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Paraiso MF; Walters MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 193(6):2105-11. PubMed ID: 16325624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
    Krissi H; Aviram A; Eitan R; From A; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
    Int J Surg; 2015 Aug; 20():75-9. PubMed ID: 26079498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Perineal Body Between Chinese Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Women With Normal Support by Magnetic Resonance Imaging With 3-Dimensional Reconstruction.
    Wang W; Chen C; Liu Y; Xu L; Wen T; Liu P
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Nov; 28(11):778-785. PubMed ID: 36288117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mind the Gap: Changes in Levator Dimensions After Sacrocolpopexy.
    Geynisman-Tan J; Kenton KS; Brown O; Gillingham A; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Collins SA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e184-e186. PubMed ID: 32412971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can we define excess vaginal space? - Genital hiatus size and prolapse severity are correlated with cube pessary size.
    Nemeth Z; Farkas N; Farkas B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():61-64. PubMed ID: 32791394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.