These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27662604)

  • 1. Prognosis of Indirect Composite Resin Cuspal Coverage on Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: An In Vivo Prospective Study.
    Dias MCR; Martins JNR; Chen A; Quaresma SA; Luís H; Caramês J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):598-604. PubMed ID: 27662604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
    Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-year clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth with different cavity preparation designs: a randomized clinical trial.
    Fouda H; Hassanein OE; Saber S; Haridy MF; Baz ME; Ahmed HS; Abuelezz A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1009. PubMed ID: 39210360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration.
    Mannocci F; Bertelli E; Sherriff M; Watson TF; Ford TR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 12426500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect coronal restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rohym SM; Badra H; Nassar H
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):696. PubMed ID: 38879492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
    Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of composite fiber insertion along with low-shrinking composite resin on cuspal deflection of root-filled maxillary premolars.
    Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Ajami AA; Zonuz GA; Bahari M; Pournaghiazar F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 23250159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.