These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2766318)

  • 1. Effect of a decrease of interproximal overexposure of bitewing radiographs on the diagnosis of approximal caries.
    ten Bosch JJ; Noordmans J; Arnold LV; Borsboom PC
    Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 2766318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs.
    van der Stelt PF; Ruttiman UE; Webber RL; Heemstra P
    Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 2766319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis of interproximal caries lesions with deep convolutional neural network in digital bitewing radiographs.
    Bayraktar Y; Ayan E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):623-632. PubMed ID: 34173051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Errors in diagnosis of approximal caries on bitewing radiographs.
    Murray JJ; Shaw L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1975 Nov; 3(6):276-82. PubMed ID: 1059515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of caries using axial-mesial-distal sections and interproximal and periapical radiographs with paralleling and bisecting technics].
    Ferreira ET; Matson E; de Oliveira JX; de Freitas A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 2135428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of bitewing radiographs in detection of occlusal caries.
    King NM; Shaw L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1979 Aug; 7(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.
    Deep P; Petropoulos D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003; 69(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 12880556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bitewing radiographs.
    Heaven TJ; Weems RA; Firestone AR
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8124698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
    Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Dagenais ME; Clark BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the interproximal radiographic examination using bitewing radiographs].
    Picarelli A; Piselli D; Raffaelli R
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1981; 50(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 6949256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of Approximal Caries in Bitewing Radiographs Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Moran M; Faria M; Giraldi G; Bastos L; Oliveira L; Conci A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic spatial frequencies essential to the diagnosis of incipient interproximal lesions.
    Webber RL; Koziol PH
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 1067295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces.
    Bizhang M; Wollenweber N; Singh-Hüsgen P; Danesh G; Zimmer S
    Head Face Med; 2016 Nov; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 27809872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.