These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27663653)

  • 1. Completed Sonographic Anatomic Surveys: The Exception Rather Than the Rule.
    Glantz JC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2441-2447. PubMed ID: 27663653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completion and Sensitivity of the Second-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Survey in Obese Gravidas.
    Pasko DN; Wood SL; Jenkins SM; Owen J; Harper LM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2449-2457. PubMed ID: 27698181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal anatomic evaluation in the overweight and obese gravida.
    Thornburg LL; Miles K; Ho M; Pressman EK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 19479682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeted mid-trimester ultrasound examination: how does fetal anatomic visualization depend upon the duration of the scan?
    Catanzarite V; Delaney K; Wolfe S; Dowling D; Daneshmand S; Cousins L; Poeltler D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16142825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of fetal anomalies after incomplete anatomic surveys between 16 and 22 weeks.
    Waller SA; O'Connell K; Carter A; Gravett MG; Dighe M; Richardson ML; Dubinsky TJ
    Ultrasound Q; 2013 Dec; 29(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24263754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Early Gestation Ultrasound in the Assessment of Fetal Anatomy in Maternal Obesity.
    Romary L; Sinkovskaya E; Ali S; Cunningham TD; Marwitz S; Heeze A; Herlands L; Porche L; Philips J; Abuhamad A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1161-1168. PubMed ID: 28417475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and Importance of Incomplete Screening Fetal Anatomic Sonography in Pregnancy.
    Silvestri MT; Pettker CM; Raney JH; Xu X; Ross JS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2665-2673. PubMed ID: 27821652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limitations of the fetal anatomic survey via ultrasound in the obese obstetrical population.
    Chung JH; Pelayo R; Hatfield TJ; Speir VJ; Wu J; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1945-9. PubMed ID: 22384816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: a pilot study.
    Benacerraf BR; Shipp TD; Bromley B
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Mar; 24(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15723850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is fetal anatomic assessment on follow-up antepartum sonograms clinically useful?
    Toy EC; Montealegre AI; Fernandez LP; Harms KP; Kaplan AL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1175-9. PubMed ID: 17715311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [FETAL ANATOMY ASSESSMENT AT 11+0-13+6 W.G. AFTER ACQUISTION OF A SINGLE 3D VOLUME--MYTH OR REALITY?].
    Paviova E; Markov D; Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(4):3-11. PubMed ID: 26410942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal Anatomic Imaging Between 11 and 14 Weeks Gestation.
    Liff I; Bromley B
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 60(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 28742595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early anatomy ultrasound in women at increased risk of fetal anomalies.
    Lim J; Whittle WL; Lee YM; Ryan G; Van Mieghem T
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Sep; 33(9):863-8. PubMed ID: 23658111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved sonographic visualization of the fetal spine with the mother seated.
    Broome DR; Graichen MV; Omessi EM; Taber KH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):701-6. PubMed ID: 9490957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timing of ultrasound in pregnancy--how often? At what intervals?
    Hill LM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 24176155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging.
    Benacerraf BR; Shipp TD; Bromley B
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):988-96. PubMed ID: 16424249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of fetal structural anomalies in a basic first-trimester screening program for aneuploidy.
    Bromley B; Shipp TD; Lyons J; Navathe RS; Groszmann Y; Benacerraf BR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1737-45. PubMed ID: 25253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Is the Rate of Incomplete Fetal Anatomic Surveys During a Second-Trimester Scan? Retrospective Observational Study of 4000 Nonobese Pregnant Women.
    Padula F; Gulino FA; Capriglione S; Giorlandino M; Cignini P; Mastrandrea ML; D'Emidio L; Giorlandino C
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2187-91. PubMed ID: 26507696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detailed transabdominal fetal anatomic scanning in the late first trimester versus the early second trimester of pregnancy.
    Yagel S; Cohen SM; Porat S; Daum H; Lipschuetz M; Amsalem H; Messing B; Valsky DV
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 25542950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal anatomic survey using three-dimensional ultrasound in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening.
    Bhaduri M; Fong K; Toi A; Tomlinson G; Okun N
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Mar; 30(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 20073060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.