These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27663690)

  • 1. Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.
    Donk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 27663690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search?
    Olds ES; Fockler KA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 15109162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: converging operations in the study of the preview benefit.
    Belopolsky AV; Peterson MS; Kramer AF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 16099358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual search at isoluminance: evidence for enhanced color weighting in standard sub-set and preview-based visual search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Watson DG; Andrews L; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1414-25. PubMed ID: 20102725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature head-start: Conjunction search following progressive feature disclosure.
    Olds ES; Graham TJ; Jones JA
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1428-47. PubMed ID: 19236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):758-78. PubMed ID: 12967220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search.
    Barrett DJ; Shimozaki SS; Jensen S; Zobay O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1533-46. PubMed ID: 27195768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the time course of selection during visual search.
    Palmer EM; Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 30242674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm.
    Fellrath J; Blanche-Durbec V; Schnider A; Jacquemoud AS; Ptak R
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():93. PubMed ID: 22529795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term perceptual learning in visual conjunction search.
    Su Y; Lai Y; Huang W; Tan W; Qu Z; Ding Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1415-24. PubMed ID: 24730740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preview of partial stimulus information in search prioritizes features and conjunctions, not locations.
    Hannus A; Bekkering H; Cornelissen FW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):140-152. PubMed ID: 31482279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Hahn S; Thomas RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():44-53. PubMed ID: 24291120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.