These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27663702)

  • 1. Radiographic assessment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: is MRI superior to CT?
    Alsaleh K; Ho D; Rosas-Arellano MP; Stewart TC; Gurr KR; Bailey CS
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27663702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.
    Winklhofer S; Held U; Burgstaller JM; Finkenstaedt T; Bolog N; Ulrich N; Steurer J; Andreisek G; Del Grande F
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 27334492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
    Kang WY; Ahn JM; Lee JW; Lee E; Bae YJ; Seo J; Kim J; Kang HS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Weinstein JN; Herzog R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.
    Huber FA; Stutz S; Vittoria de Martini I; Mannil M; Becker AS; Winklhofer S; Burgstaller JM; Guggenberger R
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():45-50. PubMed ID: 31005175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplified Universal Grading of Lumbar Spine MRI Degenerative Findings: Inter-Reader Agreement of Non-Radiologist Spine Experts.
    Miskin N; Isaac Z; Lu Y; Makhni MC; Sarno DL; Smith TR; Zampini JM; Mandell JC
    Pain Med; 2021 Jul; 22(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 33713135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
    Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Could automated machine-learned MRI grading aid epidemiological studies of lumbar spinal stenosis? Validation within the Wakayama spine study.
    Ishimoto Y; Jamaludin A; Cooper C; Walker-Bone K; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Oka H; Tanaka S; Yoshimura N; Yoshida M; Urban J; Kadir T; Fairbank J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Mar; 21(1):158. PubMed ID: 32164627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
    Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Espeland A; Anvar M; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Brox JI; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Grundnes O; Negård A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35033042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI.
    Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Yang K; Makmur A; Algazwi DAR; Thian YL; Lau S; Choo YS; Eide SE; Yap QV; Chan YH; Tan JH; Kumar N; Ooi BC; Yoshioka H; Quek ST
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 33973835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability in grading the severity of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Drew R; Bhandari M; Kulkarni AV; Louw D; Reddy K; Dunlop B
    J Spinal Disord; 2000 Jun; 13(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 10872765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?
    Zotti MGT; Boas FV; Clifton T; Piche M; Yoon WW; Freeman BJC
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2589-2597. PubMed ID: 28180981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain Using a Novel Rapid-Acquisition Three-Dimensional SPACE Sequence at 1.5-T: A Pilot Study Comparing Lumbar Stenosis Assessment With Routine Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Sequences.
    Swami VG; Katlariwala M; Dhillon S; Jibri Z; Jaremko JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):368-378. PubMed ID: 27245289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis: inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification.
    Papavero L; Marques CJ; Lohmann J; Fitting T; Schawjinski K; Ali N; Hillebrand H; Maas R
    Neuroradiology; 2020 Feb; 62(2):223-230. PubMed ID: 31836911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of diagnostic lumbar MRI and nuclear imaging.
    Mulconrey DS; Knight RQ; Bramble JD; Paknikar S; Harty PA
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 16517390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation.
    Albrecht MH; Wichmann JL; Müller C; Schreckenbach T; Sakthibalan S; Hammerstingl R; Bechstein WO; Zangos S; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1752-8. PubMed ID: 25082480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.
    Doktor K; Jensen TS; Christensen HW; Fredberg U; Kindt M; Boyle E; Hartvigsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Feb; 28(1):8. PubMed ID: 32041626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability, correlation with clinical symptoms and surgical outcomes of dural sac cross-sectional area, nerve root sedimentation sign and morphological grade for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Yang J; Xiong Y; Hu Y; Huang M; Zhang L; Pu X; Li Q
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Mar; 24(1):225. PubMed ID: 36964515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.