These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27664212)
1. P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association? Farland LV; Correia KF; Wise LA; Williams PL; Ginsburg ES; Missmer SA Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2406-2410. PubMed ID: 27664212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Certainty Behind Reporting a Significance Result: What the Clinician Should Know. Kumbhare D; Alavinia SM Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1147-1150. PubMed ID: 31464749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: a comment on Cumming (2014). Morey RD; Rouder JN; Verhagen J; Wagenmakers EJ Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1289-90. PubMed ID: 24604147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Yes, but don't underestimate estimation: reply to Morey, Rouder, Verhagen, and Wagenmakers (2014). Fidler F; Cumming G Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1291-2. PubMed ID: 24789841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Letter to the Editor referring to the article 'Testing agreement between a new method and the gold standard -How do we test?' published in Journal of Biomechanics (volume 46, Issue 16, Pages 2757-2760). Heinrich D J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3909-10. PubMed ID: 25468665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical fallacies & errors can also jeopardize life & health of many. Indrayan A Indian J Med Res; 2018 Dec; 148(6):677-679. PubMed ID: 30778000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new statistics: why and how. Cumming G Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines. Indrayan A Indian Pediatr; 2020 Jan; 57(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 31937697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing agreement between a new method and the gold standard-how do we test? McLaughlin P J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2757-60. PubMed ID: 24094718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Baker M Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):151. PubMed ID: 26961635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Describing numerical variables: which are the most appropriate parameters to describe the data? Duquia RP; González-Chica DA; Bastos JL; Martínez-Mesa J; Bonamigo RR An Bras Dermatol; 2017; 92(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29364444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing. Gagnier JJ; Morgenstern H J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1598-1603. PubMed ID: 28926390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The science in the p-value: need for a rethinking. Ramanathan M Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(4):223-225. PubMed ID: 29125466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reverberations of the past or the pitfalls of statistical and data manipulation]. Martin-Du-Pan RC Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(299):1332-3. PubMed ID: 21793426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Some old and some new statistical tools for outcomes research. Normand SL Circulation; 2008 Aug; 118(8):872-84. PubMed ID: 18711024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consequential rather than 'significant' results. Bangdiwala SI Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2016 Sep; 23(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 27333158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current research in biostatistics. Afifi AA; Yu F Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 20172063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters. Grzybowski A; Mianowany M Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]