492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27664296)
1. No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols.
Horvath JC; Carter O; Forte JD
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():544-552. PubMed ID: 27664296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke.
Mahmoudi H; Borhani Haghighi A; Petramfar P; Jahanshahi S; Salehi Z; Fregni F
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(15-16):1383-8. PubMed ID: 21110732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?
Naros G; Geyer M; Koch S; Mayr L; Ellinger T; Grimm F; Gharabaghi A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2119-26. PubMed ID: 26818881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.
Kidgell DJ; Goodwill AM; Frazer AK; Daly RM
BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14():64. PubMed ID: 23815634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polarity specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition.
Tazoe T; Endoh T; Kitamura T; Ogata T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114244. PubMed ID: 25478912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex.
Mordillo-Mateos L; Turpin-Fenoll L; Millán-Pascual J; Núñez-Pérez N; Panyavin I; Gómez-Argüelles JM; Botia-Paniagua E; Foffani G; Lang N; Oliviero A
Brain Stimul; 2012 Jul; 5(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 21782545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children.
Ciechanski P; Kirton A
Cereb Cortex; 2017 May; 27(5):2758-2767. PubMed ID: 27166171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals.
Tremblay S; Beaulé V; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Neuroreport; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 23196416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the premotor cortex: effects on hand dexterity.
Pavlova E; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA; Borg J
Brain Res; 2014 Aug; 1576():52-62. PubMed ID: 24978602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.
Lang N; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Lemon RN
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 14745467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propriospinal cutaneous-induced EMG suppression is unaltered by anodal tDCS of healthy motor cortex.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Peek S; Byblow WD
Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep; 128(9):1608-1616. PubMed ID: 28715712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
O'Shea J; Boudrias MH; Stagg CJ; Bachtiar V; Kischka U; Blicher JU; Johansen-Berg H
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 3(Pt 3):924-33. PubMed ID: 23727528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.
Ambrus GG; Chaieb L; Stilling R; Rothkegel H; Antal A; Paulus W
Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 616():98-104. PubMed ID: 26826607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
