These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27664506)

  • 1. META-GLARE: A meta-system for defining your own computer interpretable guideline system-Architecture and acquisition.
    Bottrighi A; Terenziani P
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Sep; 72():22-41. PubMed ID: 27664506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. META-GLARE: a shell for CIG systems.
    Bottrighi A; Rubrichi S; Terenziani P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():218-20. PubMed ID: 25991134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
    Peleg M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):744-63. PubMed ID: 23806274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supporting physicians in the coordination of distributed execution of CIGs to treat comorbid patients.
    Bottrighi A; Piovesan L; Terenziani P
    Artif Intell Med; 2023 Jan; 135():102472. PubMed ID: 36628779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal consistency checking in clinical guidelines acquisition and execution: the GLARE's approach.
    Terenziani P; Montani S; Torchio M; Molino G; Anselma L
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():659-63. PubMed ID: 14728255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?
    Sonnenberg FA; Hagerty CG
    Yearb Med Inform; 2006; ():145-58. PubMed ID: 17051309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying artificial intelligence to clinical guidelines: the GLARE approach.
    Terenziani P; Montani S; Bottrighi A; Molino G; Torchio M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 139():273-82. PubMed ID: 18806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks.
    González-Ferrer A; ten Teije A; Fdez-Olivares J; Milian K
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Feb; 57(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 23177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.
    De Clercq P; Kaiser K; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 139():22-43. PubMed ID: 18806319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approaches for guideline versioning using GLIF.
    Peleg M; Kantor R
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():509-13. PubMed ID: 14728225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supporting physicians in taking decisions in clinical guidelines: the GLARE "what if" facility.
    Terenziani P; Montani S; Bottrighi A; Torchio M; Molino G
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():772-6. PubMed ID: 12463929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11604741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.
    Peleg M; Tu S; Bury J; Ciccarese P; Fox J; Greenes RA; Hall R; Johnson PD; Jones N; Kumar A; Miksch S; Quaglini S; Seyfang A; Shortliffe EH; Stefanelli M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 12509357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.
    de Clercq PA; Blom JA; Korsten HH; Hasman A
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 May; 31(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 15182844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic treatment of temporal issues in clinical guidelines in the GLARE system.
    Anselma L; Terenziani P; Montani S; Bottrighi A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):935-40. PubMed ID: 17911853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Encoding and verification of a computer-interpretable guideline: a case study of pressure-ulcer management.
    Kim HY; Park HA; Cho I; Kim J; Lee J
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 27092468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concurrent Execution of Multiple Computer-interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines and Their Interrelations.
    Bilici E; Despotou G; Arvanitis TN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Jul; 262():7-10. PubMed ID: 31349252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():887. PubMed ID: 17238506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines.
    de Clercq PA; Hasman A; Blom JA; Korsten HH
    Int J Med Inform; 2001 Dec; 64(2-3):285-318. PubMed ID: 11734393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.
    Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
    Int J Med Inform; 2002 Dec; 68(1-3):59-70. PubMed ID: 12467791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.