These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27665071)

  • 1. Inhibition of return shortens perceived duration of a brief visual event.
    Osugi T; Takeda Y; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 Nov; 128():39-44. PubMed ID: 27665071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.
    Fortenbaugh FC; Sugarman A; Robertson LC; Esterman M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):442-461. PubMed ID: 30488191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial orienting of attention simultaneously cued by automatic social and nonsocial cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22760583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.
    Pratt J; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Dec; 21(6):1343-53. PubMed ID: 7490584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.
    Harrison NR; Woodhouse R
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 26842012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An attentional grasp reflex in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Jun; 33(6):689-701. PubMed ID: 7675161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.
    Chica AB; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 17160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return.
    Souto D; Born S; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 29520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.