311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27665357)
41. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Testosterone replacement therapy following radical prostatectomy.
Khera M; Grober ED; Najari B; Colen JS; Mohamed O; Lamb DJ; Lipshultz LI
J Sex Med; 2009 Apr; 6(4):1165-1170. PubMed ID: 19207277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Testosterone replacement therapy in the setting of prostate cancer treated with radiation.
Pastuszak AW; Pearlman AM; Godoy G; Miles BJ; Lipshultz LI; Khera M
Int J Impot Res; 2013 Jan; 25(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 22971614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Changes in the levels of testosterone profile over time in relation to clinical parameters in a cohort of patients with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance.
Zakaria AS; Dragomir A; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Aprikian A
World J Urol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 29560520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Testosterone replacement in prostate cancer survivors with hypogonadal symptoms.
Leibowitz RL; Dorff TB; Tucker S; Symanowski J; Vogelzang NJ
BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1397-401. PubMed ID: 19912179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. PI-RADSv2: How we do it.
Greer MD; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 28236334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Validation of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Retrospective Analysis.
Nguyentat M; Ushinsky A; Miranda-Aguirre A; Uchio E; Lall C; Shirkhoda L; Lee T; Green C; Houshyar R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Nov; 47(6):404-409. PubMed ID: 29126575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
Woo S; Suh CH; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 28196723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Recurrence of prostate cancer in patients receiving testosterone supplementation for hypogonadism.
Gray H; Seltzer J; Talbert RL
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2015 Apr; 72(7):536-41. PubMed ID: 25788507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores.
Barkovich EJ; Shankar PR; Westphalen AC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):847-854. PubMed ID: 30807218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. High serum dihydrotestosterone examined by ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS as a predictor of benign prostatic hyperplasia or Gleason score 6 cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 3-10 ng/mL.
Miyoshi Y; Uemura H; Suzuki K; Shibata Y; Honma S; Harada M; Kubota Y
Andrology; 2017 Mar; 5(2):262-267. PubMed ID: 27813361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Active surveillance in males with low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: A modern prospective cohort study.
Rakauskas A; Tawadros T; Lucca I; Herrera F; Bourhis J; Burruni R; Gomes MN; Codeluppi C; Jolliet L; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Jichlinski P; Berthold D; Valerio M
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jul; 62(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 34190436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.
Deniffel D; Abraham N; Namdar K; Dong X; Salinas E; Milot L; Khalvati F; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6867-6876. PubMed ID: 32591889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. High prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) scores are associated with elevated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) grade and biopsy Gleason score, at magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion software-based targeted prostate biopsy after a previous negative standard biopsy.
De Luca S; Passera R; Cattaneo G; Manfredi M; Mele F; Fiori C; Bollito E; Cirillo S; Porpiglia F
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):723-730. PubMed ID: 27112799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate.
Purysko AS; Bittencourt LK; Bullen JA; Mostardeiro TR; Herts BR; Klein EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 28570099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
