These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2766617)

  • 1. Reduction of stress shielding beneath a bone plate by use of a polymeric underplate. An experimental study in dogs.
    Jasmine MS; Dahners LE; Gilbert JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Sep; (246):293-9. PubMed ID: 2766617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
    Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
    Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Less rigid internal fixation plates: historical perspectives and new concepts.
    Woo SL; Lothringer KS; Akeson WH; Coutts RD; Woo YK; Simon BR; Gomez MA
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):431-49. PubMed ID: 6491792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic compression plate fixation: a biomechanical comparison of unicortical vs bicortical distal screw fixation.
    Davenport SR; Lindsey RW; Leggon R; Miclau T; Panjabi M
    J Orthop Trauma; 1988; 2(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 3230499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in long-bone structural properties during the first 8 weeks of plate implantation.
    Carter DR; Shimaoka EE; Harris WH; Gates EI; Caler WE; McCarthy JC
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 6491803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress analyses after femoral shaft osteotomy fixed by various plates with different rigidities in simulation test.
    Xu XX; Zhang X; Liu JG; Wang JB; Shi DG; Liu SX
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1993 Feb; 106(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 8504696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate.
    Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Binnington AG; Szivek J; Macnab I
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Sep; 13(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 383716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new approach to the design of internal fixation plates.
    Woo SL; Simon BR; Akeson WH; Gomez MA; Seguchi Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 6863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An experimental study of the effects of stress-relaxation plate on bone remodeling].
    Dai M; Dai K; Qui S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 33(11):698-700. PubMed ID: 8731919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of semicontoured, locking plate-rod fixation and anatomically contoured, conventional plate-rod fixation applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora.
    Goh CS; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; Palmer RH
    Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19119945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volar fixation for dorsally angulated extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a biomechanical study.
    Koh S; Morris RP; Patterson RM; Kearney JP; Buford WL; Viegas SF
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006; 31(5):771-9. PubMed ID: 16713841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
    Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods.
    Sohn RC; Jahng KH; Curtiss SB; Szabo RM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 33(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 18343284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental studies on "less rigid" polyacetal plates for fracture fixation (author's transl)].
    Kusunose K
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 May; 56(5):399-414. PubMed ID: 7108319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mechanical and morphological properties of bone beneath internal fixation plates of differing rigidity.
    Claes L
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 2918416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability.
    Stoffel K; Lorenz KU; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jul; 21(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 17620993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.