BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27666513)

  • 21. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Early Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Matched Control Study.
    Gallotta V; Cicero C; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Petrillo M; Fagotti A; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 27856387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Total Laparoscopic Resection Surgery for a Cervical Carcinoma that Recurred in the Pelvic Sidewall After Radical Hysterectomy and Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
    Kanao H; Aoki Y; Kato K; Matoda M; Okamoto S; Nomura H; Omatsu K; Utsugi K; Takeshima N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):899-900. PubMed ID: 28642025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
    Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Could lymphadenectomy be avoided in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative chemoradiation? A large-scale retrospective study.
    Ferrandina G; Distefano M; Mascilini F; Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Cosentino F; Costantini B; Ercoli A; Pedone Anchora L; Fanfani F; Margariti AP; Valentini V; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2270-2276. PubMed ID: 28988767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
    Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chemoradiation with concomitant boosts followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: long-term results of the ROMA-2 prospective phase 2 study.
    Ferrandina G; Gambacorta A; Gallotta V; Smaniotto D; Fagotti A; Tagliaferri L; Foti E; Fanfani F; Autorino R; Scambia G; Valentini V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(4):778-85. PubMed ID: 25585781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.
    Fagotti A; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli-Alletti S; Avenia N; Iodice R; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 24325899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Vizza E; Pellegrino A; Milani R; Fruscio R; Baiocco E; Cognetti F; Savarese A; Tomao F; Chen C; Corrado G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 21194881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.