242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27667817)
1. Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.
Sadek MM; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 27667817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.
Sadek MM; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 25114124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.
Swasty D; Lee J; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e377-89. PubMed ID: 21435546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone thickness of the adult alveolar process--a retrospective CBCT study.
Germec-Cakan D; Tozlu M; Ozdemir F
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24968646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of the cortical and cancellous bone density and thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of interradicular area of adults with different facial growth pattern.
Hasani M; Afzoon S; Karandish M; Parastar M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):753. PubMed ID: 37833666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion.
Raber A; Kula K; Ghoneima A
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 31015017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3D comparison of dimension of infrazygomatic crest region in different vertical skeletal patterns: A retrospective study.
Murugesan A; Jain RK
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):770-775. PubMed ID: 32978079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of 3 vertical facial patterns on alveolar bone quality at selected miniscrew implant sites.
Li H; Zhang H; Smales RJ; Zhang Y; Ni Y; Ma J; Wang L
Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 24398849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CBCT atlas of buccal cortical bone thickness in interradicular spaces.
Holmes PB; Wolf BJ; Zhou J
Angle Orthod; 2015 Nov; 85(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 25760885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm.
Nowzari H; Molayem S; Chiu CH; Rich SK
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 20491811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
Silvestrini Biavati A; Tecco S; Migliorati M; Festa F; Panza G; Marzo G; Gherlone E; Tetè S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
