These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27667898)

  • 1. Accuracy in the Diagnosis of the Mental Nerve Loop. A Comparative Study Between Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    do Couto-Filho CE; de Moraes PH; Alonso MB; Haiter-Neto F; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    Int J Morphol; 2015 Mar; 33(1):327-332. PubMed ID: 27667898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the position and level of mental nerve for placement of implants using cone-beam computed tomography & panoramic radiograph in the Saudi population.
    AlQahtani NA
    Saudi Dent J; 2022 May; 34(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 35692242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and cone beam computerized tomography.
    Vujanovic-Eskenazi A; Valero-James JM; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Gay-Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Mar; 20(2):e239-45. PubMed ID: 25549693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mental Nerve Anterior Loop Detection in Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Radiograph for Safe Dental Implant Placement.
    Othman B; Zahid T
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30687. PubMed ID: 36320798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence, length, and patterns of Anterior Loop among the South Indian population: A comparative study between Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Mathew A; N M
    Porto Biomed J; 2023; 8(3):e216. PubMed ID: 37362018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiographs underestimate extensions of the anterior loop and mandibular incisive canal.
    de Brito AC; Nejaim Y; de Freitas DQ; de Oliveira Santos C
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Sep; 46(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 27672611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
    J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
    Mahdian M; Moghaddam EJ; Alzahrani A; Rengasamy K; Tadinada A
    Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tomographic evaluation of the mandibular nerve in the mental region and its surgical implications: a cross-sectional study.
    Tejada CML; Claudino M; Azevedo Alanis LR; Manfrinato JPL; Bernardes SR; Thomé G; Fontão FNGK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar; 51(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 34120793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study.
    Özalp Ö; Tezerişener HA; Kocabalkan B; Büyükkaplan UŞ; Özarslan MM; Şimşek Kaya G; Altay MA; Sindel A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 30607351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Detection of Tonsilloliths.
    Ozdede M; Akay G; Karadag O; Peker I
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 31842016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection and measurements of apical lesions in the upper jaw by cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography as a function of cortical bone thickness.
    Ketabi AR; Ketabi S; Nabli MB; Lauer HC; Brenner M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4067-4073. PubMed ID: 30796590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the frequency of visualization of morphological variations in anatomical bone features in the mandibular interforaminal region through cone-beam computed tomography.
    do Carmo Oliveira M; Tedesco TK; Gimenez T; Allegrini S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Oct; 40(10):1119-1131. PubMed ID: 29785677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
    Lam M; Critchley S; Zhang A; Monsour P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200380. PubMed ID: 33449832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing dental identifier charting in cone beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiographs using INTERPOL coding for human identification.
    Franco A; Orestes SGF; Coimbra EF; Thevissen P; Fernandes Â
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109860. PubMed ID: 31310942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the Anterior Loop of the Mental Nerve Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Scan.
    Lu CI; Won J; Al-Ardah A; Santana R; Rice D; Lozada J
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 24552176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of intrabony nerve canals in mandibular interforaminal region by using cone-beam computed tomography and a recommendation of safe zone for implant and bone harvesting.
    Yang XW; Zhang FF; Li YH; Wei B; Gong Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 28374431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.