These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27668377)

  • 21. The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.
    Guldbrandt LM
    Dan Med J; 2015 Mar; 62(3):. PubMed ID: 25748876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Translating New Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines into Practice: The Experience of One Community Hospital.
    Ledford CJ; Gawrys BL; Wall JL; Saas PD; Seehusen DA
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 26769888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clearing the air: steps for lung cancer screening success.
    Jokerst C; Oliva I; Mohammed TL
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2015; 44(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 25541106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of risk prediction models to lung cancer screening: a review.
    Tammemägi MC
    J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):88-100. PubMed ID: 25692785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lung Cancer Screening Update.
    Ruchalski KL; Brown K
    J Thorac Imaging; 2016 Jul; 31(4):190-200. PubMed ID: 27306387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial: the ripple effect begins?
    Whitson BA; D'Cunha J
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010; 22(4):274-5. PubMed ID: 21549266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Update in Lung Cancer 2014.
    Spira A; Halmos B; Powell CA
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 Aug; 192(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 26230235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening for lung cancer: are you a candidate for this test? For those who qualify, a low-dose CT scan to look for small tumors may be free of charge. Here's how it works.
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2014 Jan; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 24683610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The importance of screening for lung cancer.
    Horeweg N; de Koning H
    Expert Rev Respir Med; 2014 Oct; 8(5):597-614. PubMed ID: 25158921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program.
    Fintelmann FJ; Bernheim A; Digumarthy SR; Lennes IT; Kalra MK; Gilman MD; Sharma A; Flores EJ; Muse VV; Shepard JA
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(7):1893-908. PubMed ID: 26495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Public Preferences for Lung Cancer Screening Policies.
    Broekhuizen H; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM; Vliegenthart R; Groen H; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):961-968. PubMed ID: 28712626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lung Cancer Screening: Pros and Cons.
    Lazris A; Roth AR
    Am Fam Physician; 2019 Jun; 99(12):740-742. PubMed ID: 31194491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lung Cancer Screening: Patient Selection and Implementation.
    Thomas NA; Tanner NT
    Clin Chest Med; 2020 Mar; 41(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 32008631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to minimize harms of lung cancer screening.
    Veronesi G
    J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9(11):e83. PubMed ID: 25436811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [From the NLST randomized trial to the clinic: how should we implement individual lung cancer screening in clinical practice?].
    Couraud S; Barlési F; Lemarié E; Zalcman G; Milleron B;
    Rev Mal Respir; 2013 Jan; 30(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 23318184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    Moyer VA;
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 160(5):330-8. PubMed ID: 24378917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in the randomized NELSON trial.
    Horeweg N; van der Aalst CM; Thunnissen E; Nackaerts K; Weenink C; Groen HJ; Lammers JW; Aerts JG; Scholten ET; van Rosmalen J; Mali W; Oudkerk M; de Koning HJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Apr; 187(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 23348977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program.
    Mulshine JL; D'Amico TA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2014; 64(5):352-63. PubMed ID: 24976072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving the Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines at an Academic Primary Care Practice.
    Brenner AT; Cubillos L; Birchard K; Doyle-Burr C; Eick J; Henderson L; Jones L; Massaro M; Minish B; Molina P; Pignone M; Ratner S; Rivera MP; Reuland DS
    J Healthc Qual; 2018; 40(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28885238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of a printed decision aid on patients' intention to undergo prostate cancer screening: a multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care.
    Tran VT; Kisseleva-Romanova E; Rigal L; Falcoff H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2015 May; 65(634):e295-304. PubMed ID: 25918334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.