These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 276684)
1. The family: changing values. Family law in flux. Dembitz N N Y State J Med; 1978 Aug; 78(9):1410-2. PubMed ID: 276684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Women in Egypt: new roles and realities. Lesch AM; Sullivan EL UFSI Rep; 1986; (22):1-9. PubMed ID: 12315070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health/family law update. Ferment in family law affects providers in malpractice cases. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1983 Aug; 57(16):111, 114-6. PubMed ID: 6873890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 7. The family and the law in 1970. In: The family and its future. Stone OM Ciba Found Symp; 1970; ():87-100. PubMed ID: 5210934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The girl child and law. Jain A Soc Change; 1995; 25(2-3):119-23. PubMed ID: 12158000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healthy children in healthy families. Larkin VD N Y State J Med; 1978 Aug; 78(9):1412-4. PubMed ID: 276685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law and family planning. Lee LT Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Apr; 2(4):81-98. PubMed ID: 5113349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proclamation No. R. 151, Natal Code of Zulu Law, 3 September 1987. South Africa Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():68, 420-39. PubMed ID: 12289657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adapting institutions to changing needs. Somers AR Hospitals; 1974 May; 48(9):41-4. PubMed ID: 4831401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New realities of the American family. Ahlburg DA; De Vita CJ Popul Bull; 1992 Aug; 47(2):1-44. PubMed ID: 12317840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The deterioration of the family: a law and economics perspective. Parkman AM Nebr Symp Motiv; 1995; 42():21-52. PubMed ID: 7566261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing socio-cultural values: impact on family. Pethe S; George M; Pillai M Nurs J India; 1995 Feb; 86(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 7651866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The conservative case for abortion. Muller JZ New Repub; 1995 Aug 21-28; 213(8-9):27-9. PubMed ID: 11656443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The gynecologist and "therapeutic" abortion: the changing times. De Alvarez RR; Wingate MB Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 5527397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Should you stay together for the kids? Kirn W Time; 2000 Sep; 156(13):74-8, 80, 82. PubMed ID: 11183322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Law No. 3, the Family Code, 8 January 1978. Yemen Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():60, 414-8. PubMed ID: 12344483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Is a sociology of abortion possible?]. Isambert FA Rev Fr Sociol; 1982; 23(3):359-81. PubMed ID: 12339246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jewish views on abortion. Jakobovits I Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 11663541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation. Lichter DT; McLaughlin DK; Ribar DC Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):281-7. PubMed ID: 9859019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]