179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27668486)
1. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!
Bocchi A; Giancola M; Piccardi L; Palmiero M; Nori R; D'Amico S
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 236(12):3121-3129. PubMed ID: 30155563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.
Brunyé TT; Wood MD; Houck LA; Taylor HA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 27156528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.
Youngson NL; Vollebregt M; Sutton JE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 30883177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty.
Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dynamics of memory consolidation of landmarks.
van Ekert J; Wegman J; Jansen C; Takashima A; Janzen G
Hippocampus; 2017 Apr; 27(4):393-404. PubMed ID: 28032685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.
Keller M; Sutton JE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 33764100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.
Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):768-785. PubMed ID: 26595065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive correlates of spatial navigation: Associations between executive functioning and the virtual Morris Water Task.
Korthauer LE; Nowak NT; Frahmand M; Driscoll I
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():470-478. PubMed ID: 27720743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visuospatial over verbal demands in predicting Tower of London planning tasks.
Cheetham JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM
Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 22229777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial navigation from same and different directions: The role of executive functions, memory and attention in adults with autism spectrum disorder.
Ring M; Gaigg SB; de Condappa O; Wiener JM; Bowler DM
Autism Res; 2018 May; 11(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 29405653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Learning virtual routes: what does verbal coding do in working memory?].
Gyselinck V; Grison É; Gras D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 25730644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does spatial cognitive style affect how navigational strategy is planned?
Bocchi A; Palmiero M; Nori R; Verde P; Piccardi L
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2523-2533. PubMed ID: 31332472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task.
Ranjbar Pouya O; Byagowi A; Kelly DM; Moussavi Z
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1406-1419. PubMed ID: 27156658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contribution of visual attention and declining verbal memory abilities to age-related route learning deficits.
Grzeschik R; Conroy-Dalton R; Innes A; Shanker S; Wiener JM
Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():50-61. PubMed ID: 30826535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social targets improve body-based and environment-based strategies during spatial navigation.
Kuehn E; Chen X; Geise P; Oltmer J; Wolbers T
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Mar; 236(3):755-764. PubMed ID: 29327266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.
Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF; Epstein RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):669-682. PubMed ID: 24364725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.
Boone AP; Maghen B; Hegarty M
Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1401-1414. PubMed ID: 31102190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are visual cues helpful for virtual spatial navigation and spatial memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease?
Cogné M; Auriacombe S; Vasa L; Tison F; Klinger E; Sauzéon H; Joseph PA; N Kaoua B
Neuropsychology; 2018 May; 32(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 29809030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
