116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27669653)
1. National Surgical Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Midurethral Sling Placement for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Slopnick EA; Hijaz AK; Nguyen CT; Abouassaly R; Gonzalez CM; Mahajan ST; Henderson JW; Bream MJ; Kim SP
Urology; 2017 Jan; 99():57-61. PubMed ID: 27669653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):523.e1-523.e8. PubMed ID: 31526790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling.
Ripperda CM; Kowalski JT; Chaudhry ZQ; Mahal AS; Lanzer J; Noor N; Good MM; Hynan LS; Jeppson PC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):656.e1-656.e6. PubMed ID: 27319367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling.
Hokenstad ED; Glasgow AE; Habermann EB; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1367-1370. PubMed ID: 29327120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 30-Day Morbidity and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling: Analysis of 8772 Cases Using a National Prospective Database.
Cohen AJ; Packiam VT; Nottingham CU; Alberts BD; Faris SF; Bales GT
Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():72-9. PubMed ID: 27196030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low Serum Albumin Correlates With Adverse Events Following Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
Ginsburg KB; Schwabe JR; Cochrane JA; Tapper A; Burks F; Rambhatla A
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():178-182. PubMed ID: 31866523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sling Procedures for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Comparison of National Practice Patterns between Urologists and Gynecologists.
James MB; Theofanides MC; Sui W; Onyeji I; Badalato GM; Chung DE
J Urol; 2017 Dec; 198(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28684228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of postoperative complications from stress urinary incontinence procedures: a NSQIP database study.
Bonus ML; Luchristt D; Brown O; Collins S; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Aug; 33(8):2291-2297. PubMed ID: 35028702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-hospital syndrome predicts poor postoperative outcomes and increased cost following transvaginal midurethral sling placement.
Hart ST; Nelson M; Kirshenbaum E; Chen Y; Mueller ER; Gupta G
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 31197429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study.
Bretschneider CE; Geynisman-Tan J; Mueller MG; Collins SA; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):e559-e562. PubMed ID: 33315624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative Urinary Retention and Urinary Tract Infections Predict Midurethral Sling Mesh Complications.
Punjani N; Winick-Ng J; Welk B
Urology; 2017 Jan; 99():42-48. PubMed ID: 27773649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of sling revision after mid-urethral sling procedures: a case-control study.
Clancy AA; Gauthier I; Ramirez FD; Hickling D; Pascali D
BJOG; 2019 Feb; 126(3):419-426. PubMed ID: 30220104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sling location in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence following midurethral sling.
Gilchrist AS; Rovner ES
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 22014964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes associated with the use of midurethral slings for stress incontinence surgery according to the type of hospitalization.
Thubert T; Daher N; Mansoor A; Debodinance P; Fernandez H; Deffieux X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25666315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Outcomes Between the Top-down Versus the Bottom-up Approach for Retropubic Midurethral Sling.
Mehrotra V; Pearl J; Sheyn D; Wherley SD
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):849-854. PubMed ID: 38376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation.
Propst K; O'Sullivan DM; Tulikangas PK
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1463-1467. PubMed ID: 28236038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement.
Brennand EA; Quan H
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 133(6):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31135723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms.
South MM; Wu JM; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Roelands JJ; Amundsen CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):564.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19249728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
